2007-01-13 14:29:26 · 13 answers · asked by Cupid 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
A world with out hatred will help in eradicating poverty, but the other way round is not the same. Hence, it is better to have a world with out hatred.
2007-01-15 04:21:07 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say world without poverty.
World without hatred may still be world full of indifference, in which case poverty would be even a greater curse.
World without poverty would at least not starve for the necessities even as life may become more risky due to mutual hatred.
In order of priority, necessities do come before morals.... difficult to understand though until and unless we actually face the negation of a necessity.
2007-01-13 23:04:21 · answer #2 · answered by small 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A world without hatred is by far preferred. No matter how rich people become, if they hate each other, wars will eventually ensue. On the other hand, elimination of hatred is likely to lead to a lasting peace in which we could stop spending money and research on weapons and address issues of sociological importance...like poverty.
2007-01-13 22:58:57 · answer #3 · answered by David W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, depends. if you want the world to advance economically, then pick a world without poverty. if you want to advance the world spiritually/morally, then pick a world without hatred.
But in a world without hatred, I think that maybe the wealthy wouldn't be so greedy, and maybe be able to help the poor more, and create a more even society, so that no one is starving while the celebs are buying million dollar fur coats.
haha, maybe the world without hatred is a two-way win? :)
2007-01-13 22:54:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would prefer 'world without hatred'.
You can tackle poverty as sciences have the means.It needs collective wisdom to wipe out hatred, which is a difficult proposition as we can see. So, "World without hatred" is the obvious choice.
"" Let there be no hatred.""
2007-01-14 12:40:30 · answer #5 · answered by amitabha 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A world without hatred. To me if someone hates me that much I could have all of the money in the world and I still wouldn't be fulfilled.
2007-01-13 22:38:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
World without hatred.
Because in a world without one, poverty will no longer prevail.
People will stop warring on each other, and charity will increase.
Then the pigs will start flying again.
2007-01-13 22:38:30 · answer #7 · answered by dan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
World with out poverty is of higher priority than the other.
2007-01-14 11:13:00 · answer #8 · answered by Doubt 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
without hatred there would be no poverty because everyone would share
2007-01-14 00:20:28 · answer #9 · answered by cherry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Theres plenty of people who are in poverty.who are happy enough.I am disabled and poor,lost my home to a disaster, if I had to choose between getting my home and possessions back and being filled with hate of course I would take poverty.with no home.a black man robbed me kicked me till my ribs broke and punctured my lung it filled with fluid.and the pain was really something else.have had a number of bad troubles with black folk.. but I painted the entire church property of an all black church across the street from me . the house. the huge garage. play area. the church. took months.just because I wonted to.free.hate is not a part of me. I have the love of Christ in me.I refuse to hate anyone.though sometimes it take a while to truly forgive .as like the Muslims. I don't hate them because some of them are terrorists.I am reading a Qur'an right now to better understand them.I was blessed to have had some exceptional fine wonderful Christian parents to learn from..Peace.Y'all.
2007-01-13 23:07:54 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋