English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If one of your friends, or one of your parents was brutally tortured/ and or killed would you still not support the death penalty?

2007-01-13 13:45:01 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

25 answers

I cannot, and will not, EVER be able to understand how people can be against the death penalty. To force the families of the victims to pay for the criminal's food and shelter for the rest of their lives is cruel and unusual punishment. The death penalty is a must for these scumbags

2007-01-13 13:51:49 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 6 6

It is a mistake to think of this as a liberal thing. Liberals and conservatives are on both sides of the death penalty issue.

You can find some interesting responses to your question in the testimony of some murder victims' family members before the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Commission. In very powerful testimony they said that although they support the death penalty in theory, they prefer life without parole because of the effect of the death penalty process on families like theirs.

The process can be very hard on these families. They are forced to relive their ordeal in the courts and in the media. Life without parole is swift and sure. (It means what it says, being locked up for 23 hours a day forever, and then still having to face whatever comes next is not a picnic.) Life without parole is rarely appealed.

And even murder victims families are aware of the great number of people released from death row with evidence of their innocence. Speeding up the process is no answer. Who wants the death of an innocent person?

There are also organizations of victims' family members who oppose the death penalty in principal, Journey of Hope and Murder Victims Families for Reconciliation.

I think that no one can answer your question who has not been there. You should look at some of these links.

PS Lily is wrong about the number of people found innocent while on death row. Over 120 were found innocent, and in 16 of these cases the evidence was DNA.
And Alex B has it wrong about costs. The death penalty costs musch more than life without parole.

2007-01-13 14:08:39 · answer #2 · answered by Susan S 7 · 3 0

Which is better, knowing that the killer has her freedom taken away or just kill her quickly and give her the same thing all of us will face eventually....death.
Supporters of the death penalty are for usually for revenge not justice. Yes, some people deserve to die for their crimes but since we all will die eventually, why not take away their freedom for all their life before they die.
As a Christian I believe we should allow everyone an opportunity time to repent. Life is God's to take, and if per chance we are wrong we become guilty of murder. So it is interesting that so many Christian conservatives support the death penalty. We are not a theocracy so we cannot obey theocratic rules, which, by the way most Muslim countries are theocratic and Christians generally frown on the way their gov'ts operate, well ours will be no better to others looking in from the outside if we took that route too

2007-01-13 14:27:17 · answer #3 · answered by Knight 3 · 2 0

While it is difficult to imagine the emotional impact of the situation you propose, I do not believe I could support the death penalty in any case.

Don't get me wrong, some people deserve to die; I simply disagree that any government or court has the right to make that decision.

The death penalty is irreversible, even if the verdict is discovered to be incorrect or otherwise flawed. In such cases, a grievous miscarriage of justice has been done. Why are none of you death penalty advocates screaming for the jurors in those cases to be executed? They ended an innocent person's life - by your own arguments, shouldn't they be killed?

2007-01-13 15:13:14 · answer #4 · answered by Brad A 2 · 1 0

as a person whose fiance was murdered, I have to tell u that I am ALL for the death penalty... His killer/his brother got 2 years.. My fiance was shot to death so that his brother could borrow the car.. I think people don't mind committing murder..why should they.. if they are convicted they will be in jail 20 years or more and right before execution, someone will come up and claim that the death penalty is wrong and postpone it even longer..Some people get a college degree in prison and they live better than I do.. FYI, if a person on death row needs a kidney or liver, they get one..as few as we have, and they get one. Plus they get FREE healthcare..if they get taken to the ER, they are seen first over anyone else auto. no matter what.. I know libs and non libs that agree and disagree on this situation but as long as we continue to care more about not making the prisoners stay UNCOMFORTABLE and the death penalty as Painless as possible..not much will change.. I am really sick of us caring more about the comfort of prisoners than the thoughts of the victims and their families

2007-01-13 14:46:58 · answer #5 · answered by chilover 7 · 0 0

I am extremely Liberal, but I support the death penalty IF all avenues of checks have been traveled. I do not want innocent people being executed. In some ways, I am more Gandhi than Ghandi, but I differ in 1 way...if someone kills another person maliciously and with fore thought, they need to die. a co-worker became our county judge and we talked about the death penalty...the death penalty is not for punishment, it really is to keep society connected....society needs to know that a murderer will die...society needs the blood for blood

2007-01-13 13:56:28 · answer #6 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 1 1

Sometimes, if we don't give the death penalty, they get it anyway,

look what happened to Jeffrey Dahmer.

Sometimes prison is worse, especially for those who kill children,

and being a white man (usually serial killers) leaves you a target to begin with.

So I can understand why law enforcement likes to lock them up with the animals for a long time before they get put to death.

The deaths they are given are too comfortable though.

I think all willful child murderers should be whipped and then hung.

2007-01-13 13:57:43 · answer #7 · answered by janesweetjane 2 · 1 0

Sorry. . . I am liberal (on a majority of the issues), but on the death penalty, I am in agreement with the conservatives. I would fry the bottom of the person responsible.

2007-01-13 14:16:19 · answer #8 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 0 1

I don't support the death penelty and cannot imagine I would, even in those circumstances. I firmly believe that I have no right to take the life of another, period.

Honestly though, no one can answer this question with 100% certainty.

2007-01-13 14:00:22 · answer #9 · answered by maguire1202 4 · 2 0

nicely thats what makes a horse race chum. Does each conservative beleive interior the shortcoming of life penalty? I doubt it. in reality I beleive that most of the individuals who oppose the shortcoming of life penalty are Christians. i in my opinion do not imagine it replaced right into a sensible flow to kill saddam. i imagine the emblem of their fearless chief being damaged and restrained in a tiny cellular ought to have had a much better impact on their moral than turning him right into a martyr. i'm as liberal as they arrive yet I nonetheless do not connect each and each concept that should be seen liberal. i imagine human beings like you're in simple terms attempting to polarize this usa even better than it truly is. you're divisive. you're "a sparkling and present threat" to the cohesion of this usa. I post to you presently that you and human beings like you've not got any want to "enlighten" us liberals. truly, you want to alienate us and create disharmony. i imagine that the only aspect that you conservatives hate the most about us is that we do not beleive interior the law of morality. i do not beleive that the gubmint has a suitable to inform human beings what they could do with their own bodies. featuring yet isn't constrained to telling a lady she will be able to not terminate a prenancy or that someone can not smoke weed of their liviing rooms. i does not elect an abortion yet who am I to inform the subsequent individual they could't elect it both. I went to Valley Forge protection pressure Academy and that i ought to probable nonetheless be interior the protection pressure if I hadn't gotten truly tousled in motor vehicle coincidence. i'm a liberal yet i ought to visit Iraq if i ought to if for no different reason so as that some different person did not ought to flow. i do not help the conflict yet i should be there if i ought to. I stay in Texas and that i don't like Mexicans arising the following snagging jobs from human beings(featuring naturalized voters), yet i'm liberal. i'm a liberal and that i own guns and that i hunt. I have gay freinds and that i smoke pot. not anybody suits your concept of what a liberal is or a conservative for that be counted. You throw the be conscious liberal round like its a grimy be conscious. bite on that for a at the same time as.

2016-11-23 16:52:24 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I am strongly in favor of the death penalty. The only thing I would change is that once the person is convicted and sentenced I would have them march out of the courthouse, onto the lawn, and hung.

2007-01-13 13:54:37 · answer #11 · answered by Richard Cranium 3 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers