English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Am I the only one who thinks it's dumb to practice a player everyday and publically say that you won't use him. I think the reasoning of Becks signing with LA is a stupid excuse. Does anyone agree with me? If not tell me why.

2007-01-13 13:31:26 · 9 answers · asked by Willdawg3 2 in Sports Football Other - Football

9 answers

i agree with you.. we know that becks isnt in top form right now so his frequent practice is part of getting him back into shape. but i think its pretty dumb to publicly announce that he wont be playing(yet again). it shatters plater morale and dampens motivation. so instead of encouraging him so he'll work harder, they're destroying his will to play..

but hey, i always thought becks would've done better if he stayed in Man U, at least Ferguson seems to know how to deal with him.

so yeah, in a way, signing with LA is Becks ticket out of frustration with the galacticos. he'd rather play in hollywood, at least people think better of him there.. :D

2007-01-13 16:37:55 · answer #1 · answered by miguel q 2 · 1 0

I totally agree with you . What kind of a coach who has a great player like Beckham and not use him and keep him training for six months . Also i think that the reason for Becks to sign with LA is MONEY in the first place and second is Real coach .

2007-01-14 03:34:09 · answer #2 · answered by BREX 2 · 0 0

Its a long stretch - 5 months without a proper match but Capello felt that Beckham had no commitment to the club which could hurt Real Madrid... There's politics behind this story that no one will ever know so you can't really call it a stupid excuse.

2007-01-14 08:06:15 · answer #3 · answered by ANA83 5 · 0 0

It totally makes sense. Real is much better off playing someone who is hungry to win for Real. Beckham is most likely concentrating far more on his future in LA. Besides, Beckham is already a bench player in Madrid, so there's not a big downside to not playing him.

2007-01-13 23:10:04 · answer #4 · answered by Otis T 4 · 0 0

no hes right.how hungry could he be when he knows he leaving the club in 6months and anyways think capello wants to loan him for the remainder of his contract!also beckham hasnt played well at all since capello managed madrid!

2007-01-14 06:58:55 · answer #5 · answered by olliemort 4 · 0 0

nope he is doing the right thing beckham sucks. plus he dosent whant to play in madrid any more he is scared of getting hurt. and messing up his ugly face.

2007-01-13 23:03:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LA prolly paid him not to play him to protect their investment and to ensure he remains injury free.

But yes it's dumb and shouldn't be allowed.

2007-01-13 21:39:05 · answer #7 · answered by Powder Hound 2 · 1 1

because they're anti-american and petty. jaun pablo mantoyas F1 owner did the same thing when mantoya decided to leave F1 to come to the US and race.

2007-01-13 21:43:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

would you be mad if someone left your team to go join a team in america?

2007-01-13 23:02:18 · answer #9 · answered by mikedee 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers