Now that Saddam's chapter is over, and more troops are going to Iraq, in the name of peace and stability, and with there being increased tension between the US & Israel over Iran nuclear program, is this a front to war over Iran in the not to distant future?
2007-01-13 13:26:54 · 24 answers · asked by OSWIN J 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
Israel has a right under international law to defend itself. Iran leaders have called for the destruction of Israel. I doubt that the Israelis are going to standby and permit the destruction of their country, with or without US involvement.
2007-01-13 13:34:43 · answer #1 · answered by jack w 6 · 5⤊ 1⤋
I hope not.I really don't think that US has the capability to start another war.Things is Iraq are going from bad to worst...And if Iraq is like that,we can only imagine what Iran would be like....As for Israel.... since things didn't go that good this summer in Lebanon and since the Israelis seem to be pretty upset with what happened in Lebanon,Israel won't attack anyone soon...anyone beside the Palestinians,but this happens every day and Palestine doesn't have an army or weapons to defend itself...unlike Iran who beside having the capability of defending itself,has the support of Russia...who most probably won't just sit and watch their millions dollars that they put in the Iranian nuclear facility being blown by Israel or any other country...
So I don't think that any attack on Iran will occur soon and if it will this would be the start of another world war...
2007-01-13 19:29:57 · answer #2 · answered by Tinkerbell05 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I presume something will be done to control or halt Iran's nuclear dream.
A few decades ago Saddam Hussein tried to build a nuclear reactor but the Isreali airforce simply flew in and bombed the site out of existence. I'm wondering why they haven't already done the same with Iran. No doubt the US will already have agents in Iran trying to cause some sort of popular uprising or coup but there's no way the arabs will ever be allowed to get their hands on nuclear weapons. Some military analysts/experts suspect that the boost to US troop sizes in Iraq is a precurser to expanding operations into countries like (especially) Iran on the grounds/excuse of combating the insurgents.
2007-01-13 15:09:45 · answer #3 · answered by cosmick 4 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Iran's got a lot of money that is uses to fund terrorism in Iraq and Syria, so they're definitely ramping up to attack Israel and then the US. Europe will be last because they've already taken it from within. By then they'll have the whole world conquered.
They have the patience we don't have. They can wait til we leave in 2008 and start up their nuclear program again. Unlike N.Korea, they have plenty of money. So start getting your things in order. When Bush leaves in 2008 it will be the beginning of the end.
2007-01-13 13:56:22 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Israel will militarily take out Iran's nuclear program when it reaches the point of coming close to constructing a nuclear bomb. They will do it with the tacit approval of the USA. Who could blame Israel? How could they allow a hostile, neighboring country have "the bomb" whose president has made persistant statements like: "Israel should be wiped off of the map" or "the holocost is a myth ... propaganda perpetuated by Israel to gather western sympathy".
2007-01-14 00:48:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iran can be solved with an internal coup. There are already many groups within Iran that are trying to make this happen. They have seen the western way of life, and are tired of the current government trying to drag them back into the 14th century. All we have to do is wait, and then support the new democratic government in every way we can.
2007-01-13 13:38:11 · answer #6 · answered by J.R. 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
NO there will not be a war with Iran, because Iran is a real power house that could hurt the USA; that is why the USA took out Saddam. He was not powerful, no real power house - an easy target.
2007-01-13 14:30:45 · answer #7 · answered by hitan_2005 3 · 4⤊ 0⤋
As prepared as i'm to assert us of a's side will win,i will ought to assert no human being,basically from the plane incontrovertible fact that WW3 received't take position. yet in case you imagine about it,us of a and her allies have a very massive strategic leap on China/Russia/Iran/North Korea.as you've pronounced,all of those international places are centralled in Asia,meaning a huge pink objective is already painted.on the different hand,US has infinite bases international huge,NATO has bases international huge,and the Allies are spread around the world themselves.you've the ecu/NATO in North us of a and Europe,Japan,South Korea,Israel,Iraq,Phillipines,Saudi Arabia,Turkey and Australia contained in the Asia section.Then the French have many colonial lands in Africa.Canada can act as a "rooftop" for Russia/China/North Korea. From the appearance of it,Russia and us of a are head-to-head with plane technologies,yet us of a nonetheless has better meaning the have the earnings of length and they could save up with the technologies.China is likewise catching up,yet is likely to stay in the back of us of a/Russia for a lengthy time period if not continuously. Allied Air Forces/Navies might want to no doubt DOMINATE the skies and seas pondering NATO placed all of it is attempt into making Ships and Air craft (extraordinarily in Britain's case) so as that should not be an issue.PLUS us of a has 11 plane organizations with a million in progression and a million better being planned.Russia/China's Navies are extraordinarily and drastically not just about as good as us of a's now to not indicate the total allied forces.And without dominatin of the Seas and Skies,you could finish that the warfare is already lost. China is the purely u . s . a . that could want to apply it is overwhelming length to it is earnings,pondering Japan purely has about 3 million human beings less than Russia.US and Russia will no doubt be going rage mode with thier missle platforms.i'm able to gaurantee they received't be nuke-tipped in case you convey MAD into the equation.China won't be able to dream of transporting it is troops to the USA of a or everywhere for that count number number because thier delivery ships will be wiped out precise this second earlier they could get previous Japan,Phillipines,South Africa,or Canada. all in all,the Allies have China/Russia/North Korea/Iran tapped in each and every way.yet determined measures call for determined circumstances and once China realizes it is being trapped and beaten senseless,nukes will be released as a very last-ditch attempt.and once ONE nuke is released,thousands are released.the end.
2016-12-02 05:52:54 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I wouldnt doubt it. Mahmoud is suppose to be going to central and south America this week to meet up with Chavez and other anti-us president. in fact, Chavez is a strong advocate to Iran's nuclear program.
2007-01-13 14:50:01 · answer #9 · answered by L P 2 · 4⤊ 0⤋
No. If Israel attacks Iran the US will not. If Iran attacks the US Israel will do nothing. If Iran attacks Israel, the US will join in.
2007-01-13 13:36:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋