English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I feel bad for the kids of Britney Spears and Kevin Federline. We all know that Britney sucks at being a mom. Kevin isn't just dad-material. He's more of a playboy. So who do you think should take care of their two poor, unlucky kids? Who proves to be the BETTER (notice not best) parents?

2007-01-13 12:53:18 · 22 answers · asked by Abercrombie Lover 1 in Entertainment & Music Celebrities

22 answers

When has Britney last cared for Sean Preston or Jayden James? She doesn't even seem to care about being a mother! She spends all her time at clubs and being a whore. She is not a good role model for young children and she doesn't seem to want to be their mother. Kevin Federline is an air head and can hardly even take care of himself, he shouldn't be caring for the children either. Honestly, I think they belong in foster care and given up for adoption!

2007-01-13 13:07:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Britney

2007-01-13 13:23:00 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Britney.

2007-01-13 13:05:55 · answer #3 · answered by ball_courtney 5 · 0 0

Jayden James and Sean Preston should be handed over to Kate Hudson. She seems like such a dedicated mother. She's a single mother at the moment but she's so sweet with Ryder. Or maybe Gwen Stefani, she has a huge career, but Kingston is number one on her list. She's a decent celebrity, at least she's not making headlines 24/7, clubbing every other second, and letting paparazzi get hold of exposing pictures, like one mom did. I hope you know which mom that is! Any celebrity is better than Brit and Fed-Ex.

2007-01-13 13:03:50 · answer #4 · answered by sPrInG LiLY 6 · 0 0

i've got faith undesirable for Britney too. She become a classic 20 something year previous. while i become 22-23 i become staying out until all hours of the night each night, whether i did no longer have toddlers, i understand mothers who've completed plenty worse and been able to maintain their childrens.. yet heavily, a great form of that's the clicking insurance. it will be interesting to work out how plenty Kevin asks for toddler help. i'm no longer possibly a fan the two, yet I do experience undesirable for her.

2016-12-12 10:51:04 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Britney defiently, its obvious "K-Fed" is only attempting to gain custody for the money i think Britney is a good Mother the media just makes her out to be trailor trash and a bad Mother

2007-01-13 16:10:39 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Kevin can't even take care of the kids he had with Shar. At least Britney can afford professional help to take care of them.

2007-01-13 13:58:35 · answer #7 · answered by Fluffster1 3 · 0 0

Britney is more financially stable and K-Fed does not have a steady job. So in the best interest of the child it would have to be Britney.

2007-01-13 12:59:36 · answer #8 · answered by atttweety 5 · 0 0

Britney should get to take the kids, lets face it kevin is a dead beat dad, i dont know what she saw in him to begin with.

2007-01-13 13:21:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Britney. She's the lesser of 2 evils :p

2007-01-13 12:57:28 · answer #10 · answered by ♥ AnGeL oF cLaRiTy ♥ 5 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers