I AM (repeat) I AM stronger than emerson6199!!!!!!!
2007-01-13 10:42:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by BRUISER 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
You can tell WWE is only acting because the Great Khali is bigger and he would kill the Undertaker.
You ain't no where near as tough as the Great Khali and the Undertaker is pathetic.
2007-01-13 19:34:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by HHH 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Okay, whoever said undertaker is pathetic is so wrong. sure it's CHOREOGRAPHED, but he still displays strength, agility for a big wrestler, and he gets people going. As for khali, the only thing that makes him good is his strength. he has no mic skills, no talent, just strength.
2007-01-13 19:53:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by tr0y 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no one on this earth is stronger than him and the undertaker is not because the only reason he beat him once was with weapons and he didnt even pin him or make him tap out
2007-01-13 18:55:31
·
answer #4
·
answered by KeNnEdY a.K.a. Styles clash 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude seriously get over yourself. and you think ur stronger than the great khali, where r u from again, planet delusional?
2007-01-13 19:17:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by sammi 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
u r no where near as strong enough as the undertaker but u r right the undertaker can woop kahli
2007-01-13 20:35:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by JosephA 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
man u wouldnt stand 1secound in da ring with him
u would get smashed
2007-01-17 04:42:35
·
answer #7
·
answered by xpoisonvayne 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
dare to say that on khali's face. haha.
2007-01-14 01:17:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
dude i asked this question before, i swear! are you copying me? Ronaldinho is way better than emerson to
2007-01-13 20:50:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because your imagination is waiting to be discovered!!
2007-01-13 19:31:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋