English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It was created by noted conservative criminals Abramoff and DeLay, and has been in effect for over 10 years.

2007-01-13 08:21:55 · 9 answers · asked by bettysdad 5 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

It was created by noted conservative criminals Abramoff and DeLay, and has been in effect for over 10 years.

Did cons care about this when they were the majority?

2007-01-13 08:32:39 · update #1

It was created by noted conservative criminals Abramoff and DeLay, and has been in effect for over 10 years.

Did cons care about this when they were the majority?

Now someone is accusing Pelosi and other Dems of taking kickbacks.

First, that's libel, and will be forwarded to the congresswoman and others. Watch what you post sweetheart, It could come back and bite you. And I doubt you can afford an adequate defense.

Second, since REPUBLICANS created the exemption, did they take kickbacks?

2007-01-13 08:38:19 · update #2

9 answers

They like to have their cake and eat it too. In other words, they like to get their way and then blame it on the Democrats that there way doesn't work.

2007-01-13 08:27:24 · answer #1 · answered by Its Hero Dictatorship 5 · 4 2

that is really not an issue they shared for the thousands and thousands of human beings that they denied the minimum salary for 9 years. that is not an issue they shared for the staff of the Marianas Islands, the position forced abortions, sexual slavery and different predations characterised a artwork environment that the Republican majority by no skill said in high-quality condition to overturn (per chance because Jack Abramoff replaced into their chief lobbyist). And, that is exciting, to assert the least, that this problem got here out AFTER the vote truly than earlier it, even regardless of the reality that this time, compared to less than Republican administration, legislators had passable time to study the bill.

2016-11-23 16:20:54 · answer #2 · answered by habarugira 4 · 0 0

Who cares. Maybe Pelosi did take kickbacks. I would hpo she can afford and adequate defense. The burden would be on her to prove she didn't.
This minimum wage thing is just a ruse, started by the democrats to take Americas eyes off the tax increases they are working on. The minimum wage is a burden to the economy. A person can't afford to keep a family of three on 5.75 an hour, nor can they afford to keep a family of three on 7.25 and hour. To live a comfortable life, have adequate housing, food, clothing, insurances, and transportation, it takes two family members working for about 10-15 dollars an hour. The minimum wage only provides false hope, higher prices and fewer jobs. So aside from the dems being a bunch of liers, they are going to destroy robust economy. Please report me, I need the attention, and would like to write a book about how the democrats ruined my life over minimum wage. Please please please, I might never have to smile at some crummy customer again!!!!!

2007-01-13 09:34:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Why didn't the Democrats remove the exemption from American Samoa, since they are in power?

I guess Nancy Pelosi didn't want to upset one of her biggest contributors, Starkist Tuna.

2007-01-13 09:32:25 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Because of the Hypocrisy. Democrats are all for a minimum wage. All for it that is until they get a big enough wad of cash not to be for it.

2007-01-13 12:00:17 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Bettysdad, you're ate up with an agressive strain of stupidity. Libel??????As in Libel a Congress person???????? Report this dip weed and while you're at it, why don't you have a few facts down before inserting foot in mouth.I'm waiting for the report!

2007-01-13 09:15:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Because it is so utterly two-faced. Virtually everyone in American Samoa works at minimum wage, for one of two fruit priocessing companies. Since American Samoa is not represented by any voting members in congress, the majority party stands to gain or lose nothing by simply cutting them out. They are subject to our laws, but have no vote.

2007-01-13 08:30:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Minimum wage stinks and will be part of a two-program scheme that will destroy the economy. The other shoe to drop will be the raising of taxes.

2007-01-13 08:36:46 · answer #8 · answered by Joe C 5 · 3 1

it's hypocrisy at its finest and no one will admit to it

points towards pelosi and other dems taking kickbacks from delmonte and other industry in american somoa

2007-01-13 08:33:00 · answer #9 · answered by curious_One 5 · 3 3

fedest.com, questions and answers