English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

10 answers

for a person who has already indulged himself/herself enough it will be for procreation and for a person who already has off springs it will be sexual pleasure and for others who have neither had enough of sex and who do not have issues it will be just a silly hypothetical question. they will surely cross the bridge when they come to it as Perry Mason says.personally i would dismiss the question as irrelevant as i have had enough of both and for me it will not prove to be the proverbial hobson's choice.

2007-01-14 21:39:37 · answer #1 · answered by raj 7 · 2 0

Neither.

If one person have sex for purely for sexual pleasure then his/her children would possibly be the same. So the entire community would be become addict to sexual pleasure. Thus creating all kinds of social problems in society.

If the same person did the same sex act for procreation, then he/she may change their own sides from procreation to sexual pleasure because naturally people are not selfish but bit of addict to own sense of pleasure.

So by choosing NEITHER, people can become and behaviour like a monk. By acting like a monk, we free ourselves from pleasures of this world and try to attain the permanent peace by getting our souls to heaven.

Off course every person has a choice and whatever the choice may be the same person has to face the consequences for the choices he/she made. People would influence others. But at the end of the day people alone make individual choices and suffer the consequences.

2007-01-13 14:51:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Pleasure!

2007-01-13 07:56:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

sexual pleasure. procreation is a by product. nature has made it in such a way that sex is done purely for the pleasure and th erace propogates by itself because of the sex

2007-01-13 12:29:07 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Definitely pleasure.

2007-01-13 08:17:09 · answer #5 · answered by KiKi 3 · 1 0

Definitely sexual pleasure. I can't have kids — it would completely derail my career.

2007-01-13 08:34:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

PLEASURE! Pure back arching, toes tingling, recreational gasming pleasure!

2007-01-13 07:51:48 · answer #7 · answered by barefoot_always 5 · 2 0

MOST OF US ON THIS PLANET WERE NOT SUPPOSE TO BE HERE IN THE FIRST PLACE SO I BELIEVE A VAST MAJORITY OF US ARE MISTAKES!!!!! MISTAKE OR NOT I AM HAPPY TO BE HERE ON PLANET EARTH!!!! THAT MEANS SEXUAL PLEASURE MUST BE #1 !!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-01-13 08:05:33 · answer #8 · answered by dca2003311@yahoo.com 7 · 1 0

Sexual pleasure.

No, no, wait ............. procreation.

Wait, wait .............. both. Why must I select?

Damn! I don't know, I'm clearly confused.
:-)

2007-01-13 22:06:19 · answer #9 · answered by ~ 3 · 1 0

PLEASURE!....pure and simple!!

2007-01-13 07:54:11 · answer #10 · answered by olderbutwiser 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers