Bush followed the same path as Hitler did, perform some type of attack(false flag op) 911. For Hitler Reichstag fire, blame it on someone else , Osama, Iraq, Iran, whomever, is in need of us attacking and threatening them, of course you have to get the citizens behind you, so you announce you know who did it and they did it because of our freedom(BS) then you control the media and get the idiots in Congress, whose sole concern is the next hooker, or who they can contrive money from. To give you unlimited and uncheckable powers to do whatever you wish. Then when they disagree with you, you simply call them unpatriotic, and douse them with negative media coverage, until they shut up. Then you do whatever you want. Impeach Bush
2007-01-18 05:26:32
·
answer #1
·
answered by masterplumber75 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
a million) George Bush used a teleprompter, so did Clinton, so did Reagan, do another modern-day president. in case you imagine Obama is an fool for making use of one, then so is another president for doing the same. 2) I really do not understand what it truly is touching on, however it has not something to do with intelligence, yet Obama can spend each and each and every of the money he earned however he likes, a minimum of he earned his money somewhat of inheriting it like his predecessor. 3) it is the range of comic tale human beings make each and each and every of the time. If Bush made a comic book tale on the price of the infantrymen he despatched to search for fictional WMD's, might want to you've laughed? 4) you recognize what, i do not supply a fark. We get it, you hate Obama. Congratulations.
2016-12-02 05:24:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Our government was designed using a system of checks and balance so that one idiot president doesn't get too much power. At least that's what's supposed to happen...
2007-01-13 08:42:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by runner08 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Founding Fathers did not imagine that the voters would elect a President and Vice-President with these qualities. It is the Cream that is supposed to rise to the top.
2007-01-13 06:47:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by fatsausage 7
·
1⤊
2⤋
I disagree respectfully. I personally dont care too much for Bush but he is doing what he believes will help this country prosper. I just happen to disagree with everything he does, as i am assuming do you. I wont lie i cant wait until he is replaced. lets just hope next time people will care enough to vote. :)
2007-01-21 04:28:45
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing need to change but the crybaby losers crying over lost elections in 2000 and 2004
Are you wanting to take rights away from America is that what you want to take rights away from Americans?
Sounds communist/socialist or liberal to me
2007-01-13 07:16:50
·
answer #6
·
answered by bob b 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I'm going to assume that you're talking about either Iran or Syria, right? I don't know of any other idiot presidents.
2007-01-13 06:32:01
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
I find it funny that this administration took soo much power for the executive branch of government, it would be specially funny if the next president is a Democrat ... and inherits all that power! :-)
2007-01-13 06:36:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by r1b1c* 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
Oh I agree. Especially if the next elected president is Hillary or Obama or Kerry or Reid or Pelosi or (GOD FORBID!) Kennedy.
2007-01-13 06:34:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by kelly24592 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
specially if a dem gets in next time..right..????? i propose that right before the next election..we have an amendment that changes the prez to a figurehead position only...and then if the republicans win, we can change back....
2007-01-13 06:33:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by badjanssen 5
·
1⤊
2⤋