if it had to include iran and syria to work? honest answers only please. no blame or distractions.
2007-01-13 06:24:42 · 10 answers · asked by J Q Public 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
joint cooperation with syria and iran. iran is already helping afghanistan rebuild.
2007-01-13 07:11:38 · update #1
consider this. iran helped overthrow the taliban. our justice department and iran have been working together to protect iranian art. contrary to media reports we do have some contact and cooperation with syria and iran.
2007-01-13 07:16:14 · update #2
Yes
2007-01-13 06:30:09 · answer #1 · answered by rosierotnass 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iran and Syria are part of the problem, particularly Iran. So there is no way to create a victory when you include a party who has more to gain by our defeat. Funny, I only hear a very few Democrats speaking of victory, interesting that you aimed this the other way.
2007-01-13 15:14:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
What do you mean by "if it had to include Iran and Syria to work"? I don't think anyone is AGAINST victory in Iraq, the disagreement comes about how to go about that. I'm conservative and support victory!
2007-01-13 14:29:42 · answer #3 · answered by sillycanuckpei 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'm a moderate, but I can be conservative and yes.. I fully would support a victory in Iraq. If the job is done then Iraqi civilians can finally claim control of their country and live under a peace they have never experienced and freedom from fear of persecution. Our troops can come home... that would be awesome.
2007-01-13 14:36:45 · answer #4 · answered by 2007 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I have no idea what would constitute a victory in Iraq.
I thought this was supposed to be over when we got to inspect the palaces and found no WMDs. But then, we decided it would be a good idea to kill the last guy to have meaningful control in Iraq, Saddam Hussein.
So, no weapons, had the election, installed the government, killed Saddam - what's the point?
Maybe we should just pave the desert, fill it with Wal-Marts and Home Depots and call it a day.
2007-01-13 14:34:35 · answer #5 · answered by gabluesmanxlt 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Abso-freakin-lutely. Iran has to cease their quest for nukes and stop supporting terrorist activities in Iraq, and Syria needs to butt out also. I would also demand that Iran allow the dissident factions in their country to have a voice in things. As it is now Ahmadinijhad is turning very quickly into Nostradamus' Anti-Christ.
2007-01-13 14:30:27 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I wouls support victory if it meant we had to take over the entire middle east. Victory for us wouldn't be all that hard if we would stop wuss-footing around over there. Shock and awe all the way until we are finished.
2007-01-13 14:38:35 · answer #7 · answered by Brian I 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
we need iraq to suceed so irans people will fix there government. they will see the freedoms in a strong iraq and afganhistan and revolt and take back there government
2007-01-13 14:33:04 · answer #8 · answered by rizinoutlaw 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no, I dont trust Iran as far as I could throw it.
2007-01-13 14:30:18 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
This should be interesting. They *had* victory in Iraq 2x then screwed the pooch.
2007-01-13 14:29:08 · answer #10 · answered by Jimbo 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋