A pretty dumb decision.
2007-01-13 05:17:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
5⤋
I just don't understand why he's so stubborn! He doesn't value any opinion except those that are like his own. He replaces people who disagree with him. We were never supposed to be in Iraq. Osama ran to Afghanistan! Remember? Osama? Taliban? Yoo-Hoooo! 9/11? Saddam nor Iraq had anything to do with that. Bush let all the Bin Laden family leave the U.S. Then he let Osama disappear into obscurity! Having no results for 9/11, he picks a fight with Hussein, lies about the man having WMD's, and gets thousands of American troops killed for the cause. Not to mention his whore Tony Blair who's getting a number of Brits smoked too. But America is the one really paying the tab! Everyone else is splitting the tip! Come on! Who voted for this guy! It CERTAINLY WASN'T ME! He, Condeliar, Slick Cheney, Tony Flair, they should all go to jail! BRING THE TROOPS HOME NOW!!!
2007-01-13 06:07:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
He is certainly under a lot of pressure but being a leader of such a great country is not so easy but also there are lot of mistakes on his part and he does not have the right to invade a country and he should have consulted the United Nations.
2007-01-14 01:33:44
·
answer #3
·
answered by VIGNESHWARAN 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
We are in a real war with Islamists! Bush knows this. Better to find out earllier than later where to take the stand. America does not want to rule Iraq. Or any other country. Islamists want to rule the world with their stupid,suicidal, desilre to kill the 'infidels'. The Islamists have turned murderous just like the Nazi's in WWll. If we had not stood up to them and fought, the world would be very different now.
I can not imagine any woman standing against Bush in our fight against the ignorant Islamists. Unless they don't want to vote, own property, have the right to get educated, and want to be owned and beaten when necessary, as the Islamists platform is founded on. Saddam had one of the biggest war machines in the world. Iran also will by taking Saddams place with nuclear weapons. Don't listen to these Islamists(backward Muslims). They lie through their teeth. It is the one thing they are expert at along with blowing themselves up.
2007-01-13 06:36:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Well, at least it is a decision. Why don't those barrack room lawyers who love to criticise, tell us what they would do? and preferably, why. There are a lot of people on this site who, apparently, could do a better job.
2007-01-13 23:09:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Veritas 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is impossible for bush to make a decision, he just blurts things out with no brain behind it..
2007-01-13 14:47:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by xyz 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you mean his recent decision to send in additional troops to the Iraq debacle, its sheer madness and as such doomed to failure. History will the view the Bush presidency as a humiliation for the US which far exceeds Vietnam.
2007-01-13 05:59:02
·
answer #7
·
answered by James Mack 6
·
6⤊
2⤋
We voted President Bush into office. Let's allow him to lead. He has made a decision on behalf of the people of the USA. Whatever we "think" will not make a difference other than to either "tear down" morale or be a support to the troops. If our President or troops were reading the question, how would it affect them? Lets all put down our ideas based on absolute ignorance (none of us knows what the situation is, so at some point we have to trust The Leader) and let the President and the troops know that we are standing with them.
2007-01-13 05:29:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by lindakflowers 6
·
3⤊
7⤋
Bush has made alot of stupid decisions, and this one ranks right up there as one of the most stupid. History is repeating itself: This war is turning into a replay of VietNam and we have no chance of winning it.
My only hope is that Congress can stop Bush's death sentence on our troops.
2007-01-13 06:49:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
He's a total moron
•Went to war AGAINST international advice.
•Did not have the backing of the UN.
•No WMD (which we were told they had).
•Virtual civil war (although they will not say as much).
•He got pounded in the mid terms over Iraq his reply to the defeat “I thought I was doing alright, shows how much I know” !!!!
•3000 + killed. Not to mention hundreds maimed & mentally scarred for the rest of their lives.
•A key focus group on Iraq says (In so many words) “Is a mess, need to get out.”
•Politicians (all sides) say – “Need to get out.”
•American people say – “Need to get out.”
•His own Generals are saying – “Need to get out.”
Bush’s response ????????
Sending MORE troops in !!!!!!!
Throwing soldiers at a military problem did not work at the Somme and it will not work in Iraq - only the results will be the same.
2007-01-13 07:46:16
·
answer #10
·
answered by David 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
its the absolute most despicable decision he could ever make.obviously this man has no regard whatsoever for the lives of the soldiers lost their famillies and the future deaths to solidiers going there ..he has no heart.its a bad decision.i wont stop the violence,it will fuel it more,it wont stop iran and syria from getting involved so he will bomb them..and there you have it a war will start in 3 countries ,can the millitary fight on 3 fronts,no way.3000 deaths mr bush,3000 and rising on top of that you cut the training these soldiers get just too rush them off to war and you eliminate their well needed time off and extend their tour of duties or renew them.you have no consience whatsoever mr bush.more bloodshed and violence is what you will get here not a closer step to accessing your coveted oil in iraq,no just more pain for fammillies,more deaths,and more resentment from your fellow americans.you pulled a good one by crying yesterdy while awarding a medal to a dead soldier's fammilly,that was acting at its best,that soldier is a hero he could've been home now with his fammilly instead of the cemetery.they'll be more like him i assure you.
i am not american,nor do i hate americans i am simply speaking from a clear position here :this war is wrong on all ends and you are on a dangerous path mr bush a path where you will find a need to bomb targets in iran and syria ,and when you do not "if"when you do ,not even god can help you.if you have no brain,no heart no consience well you tend to do these things,acts of shear stupidity regardless of human life ,or what the people who elected you say in a loud and clear voice:get the soldiers out,stop playing referee at the cost of 3000 lives.spreading democracy acros a region that is vey different in all aspect from america,you pretty much are trying to impose your views on the people of the middle east.my advice mr bush...its too late now,this war is out of control,get the soldiers out and save face or go ahead and keep them there and try to fight 4 wars at the same time test your millitary might while you at it and see ..
have a heart ,for the sake of your people,the american people ,you are further impovrishing this country with the billions spent a week on this and you want to engage 3 more countries you have that many troops or that much money available?
bottom line bush,its a bad decision how bad well thats up to you it could be the start of a global war that will most surely turn nuclear,or it could be you listening to your people accepting a mistake and moving on and dealing with domestic issues and letting other countries rule temselves as they please
have a good day to ALL
COMMENTS ARE WELOMED,GOOD OR BAD
2007-01-13 05:43:00
·
answer #11
·
answered by combatmedic2010 2
·
8⤊
5⤋