with a person who has the looks, personality, charisma, the brains....yet no chemistry and sparks at all?
2007-01-13 03:50:01 · 30 answers · asked by Scarlett 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
If there is no chemistry and no sparks, there is no relationship.
Looks fade. Time ages.
A smile and a warm hand.....that endures.
The sweetest moments I ever see in my travels?
Watching the poetry of older couples as they sit together and talk.
It's the most beautiful thing in the world.
2007-01-13 06:26:42 · answer #1 · answered by JC 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No I wouldn't stay. Was in a similar situation and the chemistry just wasn't there. No matter how hard I tried to convince myself, still...... I felt nothing. You're really only hurting yourself in the end and not being fair to both you and him. It's like almost staying in a loveless relationship. I mean if you truly and dearly love this person and think you could live without the chemistry, that might be okay but I'm sure once in a while you'll be yearning for those ''sparks!''
2007-01-13 12:03:11 · answer #2 · answered by Cricket 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Are there LOOKS going to make me a happier person??? I DON'T think so! With out chemistry or sparks, WHY STAY???
2007-01-13 11:55:36 · answer #3 · answered by angelover 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I might. My reason is because one day you may wake up and see that person in a whole new light. All of a sudden, something just may click. While chemistry is very important, sometimes it may take a little while to develope.
2007-01-13 11:59:07 · answer #4 · answered by BigJake418 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I would cause chemistry and sparks will happen in time.
2007-01-13 11:53:17 · answer #5 · answered by mrsrhowell 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I won't stay with someone if I don't feel that soulmate type connection. The idea of having that completes me alone, and if I was to meet someone who I had that kind of chemistry with, I think that would be enough to keep me foreverâ¥
2007-01-13 11:54:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why would I want to stay with a person with no chemistry?
Life's too short!
.
2007-01-13 12:01:14 · answer #7 · answered by Freesumpin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
nope...i would rather have someone that has all that including the chemistry and the sparks
2007-01-13 11:53:19 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I need to have the sparks.
2007-01-13 11:53:41 · answer #9 · answered by Jade 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, does he bring home a good amount of bacon? Then YES.
Sparks are very over rated. That's what toys are for.
lol
2007-01-13 11:54:41 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋