I watched this last night, and first of all i do think daniel craig suited the role perfect and certainly looks like he could be a great bond. My favourite though is still brosnan.
I did not like the whole plot to be honest, and most of the storyline was very hard to understand. If your planning on watching it do not blink and certainly do not go the toilet otherwise your fucked basically. I did not get the very end bit where he shot that dude and said the names bond james bond? Also did not get the bit about vesper at all; was she in love with bond or some algerian dude? Also when bond first played at the casino with le chiffre, did le chiffe no who bond was?? Did he no he was a mi6 agent?
The film did not feel like a james bond film to me. It just seem to go from one country to the next, yet it didn't go to the Uk once (or did i miss that scene). I just didn't get that feel of britain...
I think on the next bond they should bring back the gadgets, and Q.
2007-01-13 02:30:23 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
My mate, who is 52, saw it and he said, when he came out of the cinema, he felt so pumped up, he felt he could take on the whole world. Sad I know but there you go. Looking forward to seeing myself. I've been told it's the best one yet. We'll see.
2007-01-13 02:38:47 · answer #1 · answered by Shunter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
seen it seen it 2ce the new darcer bond is better than the old joky bonds altouw danial crage has some gratew one liners like sorry that last hand nearly killd me and the drink oh one day ill have that just to see what it tastes like
ok the bits with M are in UK mostly and as 4 vesper se was in love with both guys and le chiffre did know about Mi6 becouse he made a point of saying or is it bond im confuesd this was not true and this bond was how bond became bond so it did not have to be like the rst oh and the end with mister whight the trale that vesper left led to him and bond shot him so he could ashk him wher ther money was becouse he had it
btw durin the filming a world record was broken 4 the most consecutive flips in a car 7 wer proformd 4 this title
2007-01-13 12:43:31 · answer #2 · answered by Michael D 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You need to see the film a few times to follow the rapid plot.
It's the first Bond film to stick close an Ian Fleming story.
Generations have been brought up on 'Pretty boy' actors in gadget laden movies with women draped around the sets (nothing wrong with that of course) as mere window dressing in limited easy to follow drawing by the numbers plots.
If you read the books you'll see a better James Bond.
As I say if you watch the movie again you'll find it all falls into place like a jigsaw.
I found it tough going myself, and I was brought up on Sean Connery as Bond in the 60's.
It's good that they've got away from the comic strip/ computer type game, the movies became.
James Bond movies should have been left in the 1960's.
Casino Royale 2006.
Bond was in the UK (interior shot), when he broke into M's apartment to hack her computer to get the access code to the MI6 files. A place he knew he could successfully obtain it.
2007-01-13 12:45:43 · answer #3 · answered by Norman Bates 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I watched it last night as well. And although I thought Daniel Craig CANNOT be Bond, he seemed to do fine. But Like you I think Brosnan is Bond. I agree about the plot...I dont know who stole money from who. The asthmatic guy was lousy at using his inhaler. The women were hot and Daniel Looked superb in the suit. But the torture scene was, I thought, not 'appropriate' for the character. Degrading I thought, just doesnt suit the mightiness of the James Bond personna.
But not a bad night out, was better than I thought.
2007-01-13 10:43:26 · answer #4 · answered by Mimi 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Although Craig was and hopefully will continue to be a brilliant Bond; I found that the movie lacked a certain sense of continuity. Like you said, it was jumping around from country to country and we (the audience) seem to be some what left in the dark.
The acting, in my opinion was fantastic.
Yeah, it did seem to lack the Great Britain feeling didn't it? Although perhaps they were going for the 'he's such a pro he doesn't need to rely on his gadgets kind of a feeling' it would have been nice to have seen a few more!
2007-01-13 14:15:00 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's brilliant. And Daniel Craig is perfect as Bond.
$500million (and the most successful Bond movie to date) at the box office suggests many other people feel the same way.
2007-01-13 13:09:21 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Not very good. I think the films should've stopped before Pierce Brosnans attempt. Just doesn't seem to work being more modern!
2007-01-14 19:12:17 · answer #7 · answered by dasguiel 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i have to say it was okay, but there wasn't a lot of talking in it, i thought that was weird.
not the best bond at all!
2007-01-13 15:40:51 · answer #8 · answered by su-si 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
He was great and so was the movie.
2007-01-13 17:17:33 · answer #9 · answered by Merrick 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
not as good as i thought it wud be
2007-01-13 10:39:35 · answer #10 · answered by @$H 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋