English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

As a Scot I can't see how it is fair that Scottish MPs can vote on issues with which English MPs would not get reciprocal voting rights in Scotland.

2007-01-13 00:19:55 · 6 answers · asked by LongJohns 7 in News & Events Media & Journalism

6 answers

Yes of course he is. He also say's the Union is in danger of falling apart. Is the man thick or something. What does he expect,the voting is very unfair.Reinforcing it serves no good,in fact just the opposite.

2007-01-13 03:17:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You don't explain why you hold that view. Scottish MP's can help to develop, and vote on, policy that doesn't apply in the Scottish constituencies, which they represent, and got them elected in the first place. Don't MP's go to Parliament as representatives of the constituency that elected them? If those policies don't apply in their Scottish constituencies, then how can they be said be representing those constituencies. You would need to explain that further.

Given that, within Scotland, there seems to be a renewed drive towards complete independance, then it becomes obvious why Brown holds the view that he does, he is an ambitious career politician. Ironically, total absorbtion into the EU would give Scotland a kind of pseudo independance from England anyway.

Would you accept it the other way round? If not, why not? I think that an independant Scotland would be a bad thing for both countries.

2007-01-13 03:36:45 · answer #2 · answered by Veritas 7 · 0 0

No, that is not a honest or democratic device, yet on account that at the same time as has that been something Westminster has ever had? there have been no moaning voices from England at the same time as the Conservatives were in skill with less than fifteen MP's in Scotland, so what gave the English majority of MP's then any proper to vote on Scottish themes? Oh, because we are the same usa in accordance to Parliament. The Scots (be conscious the spelling, Angel) have administration of training and as such are completely entitled to repeal college expenses. Why are you blaming Scots for balloting adverse to the same in England? you need to be blaming Labour generally, because that is Labour that are refusing it. the in effortless words reason they did not deal with to derail it in Scotland is because the different activities truly loved the idea and Labour couldn't muster a majority. by technique of how, the West Lothian question is so called because it replaced into raised as an difficulty by technique of the MP for that section, Tam Dalyell. humorous, isn't it, that it took a Scotsman to strengthen the problem in Parliament interior the first position? And he's a Labour guy. And in case you don't desire Scottish MP's sitting at Westminster, tell your MP to push for a referendum on Scottish independence, because that is the in effortless words way you receives rid human beings. Your serve, i experience. Edit - Bob Abuse... sure, it replaced right into a Scottish king, James the sixth that united the Crowns. He replaced into not responsible for the Act of Union, which replaced right into a 'tremendous' theory proposed by technique of London and that may by no skill have got here about if London hadn't given bribes to distinctive individuals of the Scottish Parliament to vote for it. In immediately's money, the bribes provided amounted to nicely over 3 million pounds. So that is an English aspect, this Union. It actually had, on the starting up, extra advantages for England than Scotland. Did you presently that Scotland, which had no nationwide debt, took on a percentage of britain's debt? And that it replaced into deemed that ought to there be a range of a clean monarch what England agreed ought to go? that is why a lot money replaced into spent on bribes, and why the former Scottish Parliament are many times called a parcel of rogues. if that they'd finished that interior the trendy international, that they'd were dragged out by technique of the inhabitants and shot. because they offered this usa to England, and the country were given not something out of the deal.

2016-11-23 15:43:33 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

It's so hypocritical it's unreal. Let them run their own affairs and leave us to run ours but they can't do that can they. Watch Gordon Brown try and say that he want's us all to unite - he's worried that people will start to ask why should a Scot be the next PM. Why indeed.

2007-01-13 06:42:29 · answer #4 · answered by Bexs 5 · 0 0

yes he's a hypocrite

2007-01-13 05:47:57 · answer #5 · answered by liam0_m 5 · 0 0

yes he is

2007-01-13 00:30:23 · answer #6 · answered by eimear h 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers