2007-01-13 00:11:08 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
NO Did you make this up?
2007-01-13 00:18:32 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
If convicted, he could have gotten 90 yrs.
All the charges were dropped... I saw it on 20/20 last night.
As it turned out, the kiddie porn that he was being charged with was encoded on programs that he had downloaded from these "share" websites. (music, games, movies)
They said that the freaks that enjoy this kind of crap will hide it on other peoples computers so that it keeps them in the free and clear... Then they use spy-ware to extract it from the unsuspecting persons computer...
Had this kids parents not had phat cash, and got the best lawyers and experts... His @ss would be sitting in jail!
2007-01-13 08:32:56 · answer #2 · answered by and,or,nand,nor 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Um, I can't imagine such a sentence in the U.S. even if the porn featured children.
2007-01-13 08:14:47 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is very possible!! Remember, teen consists of age 18 & 19 and that would make them an adult!!
2007-01-13 08:15:54 · answer #4 · answered by spag 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If its child porn who gives a damn? If its child porn he should of gotten more
2007-01-13 10:02:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I can believe that to be true, American judges are insane with serious nazi traits.
2007-01-13 08:18:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because in most Muslim countries it is forbidden to look or possess pornographic material.
2007-01-13 11:54:13 · answer #7 · answered by King Midas 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋