English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do you adopt the ways of the place you are in or are you still beholding to your native land? I as an American Native know no other land and want no other land and I carry my heritage with me. No matter what state I am in I don't change my heritage. But I see that people transplant themselves into different places but still carry their heritage with them and don't let go isn't that true?
I suppose if I transplanted myself I would do the same. But I wouldn't try to change, to disguise myself to be one of them. After all I might bring a dash of color into it that might be appreciated, this time around? But I think we would all rather have our own heritage right? So what is an American? A blend? An imposition to others? no offense meant but this is being said all over this site. Or is it just a bunch of aggressors?

2007-01-12 20:48:58 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

6 answers

Your heritage is your family. When you leave your family, you leave your heritage.

The only way a "region" or "land" can have claim on your heritage is if your family is part of a larger tribal unit with strong traditions.

(The word "heritage" has the same root as "inheritance". You can take your heritage with you wherever you go, but it means taking your family memories and heirlooms with you. I accomplish this by collecting as many family artifacts and histories as possible. I intend to make them a gift to my son when he's old enough to appreciate them.)

2007-01-12 20:58:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

A heritage is what makes a person have an identity, its not something to flaunt. That you are seeing others do so just says that they are insecure. Allow them their fear but don't join in unless your invited because heritages can only be shared with receptive audiences.

2007-01-12 21:03:46 · answer #2 · answered by Marcus R. 6 · 1 0

Once you make the decision to leave your native land, you have already decided to leave your heritage behind.

2007-01-12 21:20:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

It is not anything of fully throwing out your heritage, but, adapting to the Country you moved to in respect of their people, to know a little of their ways...No ....definitely do not throw out your heritage, but also get yourself to acknowledge the ways and culture of your new home.

2007-01-12 20:58:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

A very good set of questions. Questions that everyone should ask themselves.
I was brought up to understand that the clues to answer the problem, come in the form of questions. That no matter where I go, I carry my problems with me.
I have answers for them, but they are my answers to my problem.

2007-01-12 21:39:01 · answer #5 · answered by eks_spurt 4 · 1 0

each Colonial united states that could no longer close by to the Western Hemisphere, could provide land back to their close by lands people and to the civilizations of historic cities no longer suggested were chanced on to be higher than any cities in Europe in the previous due 1490s early 1500s. Natives jointly with MesoAmerican ancestry(Mexica(Aztecs), Olmec, Mayan), Natives to each and each united states in South American Ancestry (Incas), Natives to what's now North us of a, and Canada, of direction Alaska close by to each and each HUMAN form of THE WESTERN HEMISPHERE. even with the actual incontrovertible truth that the OLDEST city pyramid in the international is in Peru, Caral pyramid out relationship the Giza Pyramids. So why do a lot of people imagine Natives got here to the Continent traveled north? The Caral pyramid dates back longer than any White Civilization, yet they have large granite stones in South American with Sumerian writings on them, So if the Caral Pyramid in Peru proves the people were widely used there way earlier the were truly equipped, earlier Pyramids of Giza in the Sumerians area why do people imagine all people traveled from north to south of this Continent( Crossing from Africa to Russia to Asia and Crossing the Frozen land bridge FROM Asia to northern US/ Canada area?), per chance some did yet looks more suitable shown that many truly traveled north? trouble-free only seem at bodily effective elements of RUSSIAN/ ASIAN or maybe facial effective elements? very few do yet maximum do no longer. could it per chance that they have got been widely used has a populous in this Continent see you later as Africans Summerian area midsection East Ancestry, White Europeans Ancestry, Asian Ancestry. nicely of direction no longer simply by the undeniable fact that is not any longer what scientist say, even notwithstanding the data are laid of for us do only the study, imagine of it only and it isn't puzzling to observe how old close by WESTERN HEMISPHERE anybody is with the origins of the close by people from Peru ancestry.

2016-10-30 23:50:02 · answer #6 · answered by pour 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers