Is the term "time of leave" correct to be used here?

Question

----------------------
The *time of leave* must be approved by the First Party. In the event that leave is made under urgent circumstance without the permission of the First Party, the Second Party shall be required to notify the First Party later as soon as possible

Answer 1

"Time of leave" is correct usage, because it is considered all one description of an event -namely, time off, or a leave of absence.

In regards to one of the previous answers, "later" should surely be left out, but the ending would be better phrased as "..notify the First Party as soon thereafter as possible." In the event of an urgent (read- "emergency") leave, notification cannot reasonably be expected to be made before the fact, so it must be made "thereafter," or after the fact. -Or upon returning. There are other ways this could be worded, but in legalese, you want to state that it's to be done afterwards, not beforehand. This is obviously what you're attempting with "later," but somehow, placing the word in that particular spot creates a juxtaposition with the use of "later as soon as possible."

Good luck with that one!

Answer 2

yes take out later though

Example: The time of leave must be approved by the First Party. In the event that leave is made under urgent circumstances without permission from the First Party, the Second Party shall be required to notify the First Party as soon as possible.

Answer 3

yes

Answer 4

Yes, it can be.