ok ppl plz be patient with me ... i never done this ... facts she did not give any permission for them to go in and she can not ... she does not live there....there was no danger to make the police feel that someones safety was at stake..... and they sat and talked to her about her dad.... and never showed any ID to her me are him the whole time they where there and ... i asked what was going on and they told me everything about him and i dont live there please before you answer read other 2 quetions so you get the whole picture...they entered the home with an anonymous tip that there was narcotics there ... they didnt even know what kind! now this happened 7 months ago and they just now saying want to pursue it to a federal offense... because he had guns there legally bought and he has never ever been in trouble with the law
2007-01-12 17:54:19 · 12 answers · asked by sassy4you 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Seriously,,You Must Always Keep your Doors Locked or they will walk in & say that they were invited in.
2007-01-12 17:59:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
In short: Police are generally not allowed to enter a home on suspicion, they must have more than probable cause. There must be imminent danger. Under most circumstances, a law enforcement official cannot enter your home without (a) consent, or (b) a search warrant. If in fact, this was an illegal search, then there is a chance that even if it is prosecuted in the federal system, it may not come in under the Federal Rules of Evidence. You did happen to leave a lot out of your question, such as the outcome of their search and her specific conversation. Many more facts are needed to determine what the course of action should be.
The father and daughter (together) should (a) get their facts straight, (b) gather any/all paperwork and documentation they have been given, and then (c) consult a lawyer, at least for an initial consultation. Many lawyers will give a free consultation. If this is unworkable, try a local law school. Occasionally, they have civil and criminal clinics offering free services to members of the public.
2007-01-12 18:34:46 · answer #2 · answered by Jessica T 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It would appear that the whole story has not been set forth. If the police were in fact in the house talking to anyone, then there had to be permission to do so from someone. If there was no search, and any weapons were there by legal means, then I don't see that the police did anything wrong. They DO have the right to gather information about a case they are dealing with. I think you have watched to many police shows. If you feel they did something wrong, ask for an investigation. If someone has done something wrong, and whomever is in the house has knowledge of it, or the person involved, then yes the police have a right to investigate. They work for everyone, to protect everyone from harm. If you have nothing to hide, then what is the problem?
2007-01-12 18:40:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Get a No Cost Background Check Scan at https://bitly.im/aNC9T
Its a sensible way to start. The site allows you to do a no cost scan simply to find out if any sort of data is in existence. A smaller analysis is done without cost. To get a detailed report its a modest payment.
You may not realize how many good reasons there are to try and find out more about the people around you. After all, whether you're talking about new friends, employees, doctors, caretakers for elderly family members, or even significant others, you, as a citizen, have a right to know whether the people you surround yourself with are who they say they are. This goes double in any situation that involves your children, which not only includes teachers and babysitters, but also scout masters, little league coaches and others. Bottom line, if you want to find out more about someone, you should perform a background check.
2016-05-20 01:36:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This is hot question. Criminals are smart today. I live in O'fallon, MO and a few years ago police went into a home without a warrant and killed two innocent people. Law enforcement claims the clerk wrote down the wrong address. A warrant let's more eyes see what's going on before action. Too many innocent people are being killed without any explanation or justification today.
2007-01-12 17:59:39 · answer #5 · answered by ResidentX 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont know where u live but i dont wanna live there. Police need probable cause to enter a residence for the most part. sometimes a tip is all they need however a tip from someone should be accompanied by a warrant. Probable cause should only work when in presuit. Seek legal advice
2007-01-12 18:02:19 · answer #6 · answered by arc7499 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When you invite someone into your home and allow them to answer the door, you are bestowing upon them the privilege of dealing with the situation behind that door. If you don't want said person to make decisions about who can and cannot enter, then it's up to you to prevent this from happening by ensuring someone trusted answers the door.
The police don't need to wait to be invited in. They will ask if they can enter and if she didn't tell them "NO, you can't come in", then she DIDN'T DENY THEM ENTRY.
It's common practice for police to identify themselves, but if ID is not shown and you wish to see it, you simply ask. If no one asked to see ID, then that was not careless of the police... it was careless not to ask.
If you question their procedure and feel there was injustice done, then you need a lawyer's help.
2007-01-12 18:08:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
you can thank Bill Clinton for the police having search without a warrant, He conned the people into not complaining about the search and seizure law when he was president, but, many states don;t recognize this illegal and unconstitutional law , and this law will surely be deemed unconstitutional when and if it goes to the supreme court, mean while check and see if your state abides by this unconstitutional law , as they may not , and if they don't any thing thee cops found can not be used in a court of law to convict the man
2007-01-12 18:16:54 · answer #8 · answered by james w 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
GET A legal specialist!! do not say something or admit something to the law enforcement officials or you'll get up worse off. i'm not precisely particular about your certain problem, yet i do not see how the officer might want to assert he's acquainted with you probably did not something incorrect and then threaten you with lack of freedoms. it truly is probable a scare-tactic to objective to make you anxious. i might want to get a legal specialist precise this second, because you're able to record a police misconduct document. obviously, it truly is all assuming that they had no precise to barge into your position and such. I desire you the finest of success my chum, and that i desire this changed into of a few help.
2016-12-02 04:55:30 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ummm, nothig you said makes sense. Is english not your primary language?
There are many reasones Law enforcement may enter a house without a warent.
2007-01-12 18:04:29 · answer #10 · answered by GuZZiZZit 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He needs to get a lawyer. I don't know about the search, but they would not be able to file charges if they did not have something to file charges on. So there is something in this scenario that it seems he is not being honest about with you.
2007-01-12 18:04:24 · answer #11 · answered by searious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋