Poor (and I voted for him twice)
2007-01-12 18:17:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by david m 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
not interior a similar bellicose way as Clinton's conflict on the west, the protection rigidity, and rural u.s. however the "new international order" primary by GHW Bush, Clinton, and sped up by W relatively hurts particular sectors of the middle class interior the U. S. (particularly business hard paintings). at a similar time as the hot international order has created greater jobs interior the U. S. then have been misplaced, those jobs have been particularly in the two the low paying provider sector or intense paying technical jobs. One does not pay the charges of a longtime (not a teenager merely commencing out) laborer and the others are out of attain. the internet result's that the classic center class has reduced in size remarkably at a similar time as the top and decrease has grown. To me, the hot international order seems plenty like the previous international order of the 1800s. The final time there exchange right into a worldwide financial equipment, it got here crashing down simply by three experience in August of 1914. particular wish historic previous does not repeat
2016-10-19 22:13:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by ranford 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
On the war? Excellent, the Iraqi army and Saddam folded in days. The 'Iraq War' is over. The media likes to keep calling it a war (makes U.S. look bad, which the media loves). By definition the current situation is not a war. The post war sh!t is were Bush and co. have been miserable. But no one has ever dealt with terrorists on a scale like this before. The one good thing about it though is that most of the terroists are over there and not on U.S. soil.
2007-01-12 17:41:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by lbsurfr 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
Poor. I can assure you that he just became up to date
on some of the issues, only because the Democrats now control the Senate. Just as the former Governor Ann Richardson of Texas,I believe her first name was Ann. "She was speaking to quite a large audience, saying, "Poor George he was born with a silver foot in his mouth." His method of sending troops over there without adequate supplies, especially tanks & guns. I am ver skepital on his desire to send $20,000. more troops.
2007-01-12 17:51:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by NJ 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Excellent
He has made billions for KBR, Halliburton and other security companies and defense contractors.
This money can purchase more US politicians on the "slave block" in Washington DC.
Americans should be wondering....who is defending us against Defense Dept Spending.
We are defending a nation 8 trillion dollars in debt.....of course the average anerican has the intelligence of an oyster anyway and thinks the USA is wealthy and good...LOL
God Bless...ICELAND
2007-01-12 17:48:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Way beyond poor....down right dangerous.
I don't trust him. I fear his judgments. I don't believe he cares for the American people. And I don't think he's all that smart. He doesn't even make a good puppet. Now, do you REALLY want to know how I feel about Bush?
2007-01-12 17:55:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 5
·
2⤊
1⤋
You know how in Spinal Tap they had Marshall amps that went past 10 to 11?
Well I'd give George a -53
2007-01-12 17:50:17
·
answer #7
·
answered by bettysdad 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Fair.
He let Rumsfeld run shotgun over him after the CPA took over in Iraq and didn't listen to the commanders on the ground as he should have. He still has done well in getting us what we need so I can't say he's done a poor job. During the invasion, I would give him an excellent rating.
I feel that he has a chance to change the direction in the next three months or so. If we're going to win this fight all out, he needs to look at new directions.
2007-01-12 17:37:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 6
·
1⤊
5⤋
I would say Fair. The job isn't done but North America is still safe. Too many casualties of war. Security still unsatisfactory. ( Evidence from 9/11 and the London attacks.) Gas prices were up, but are becoming better ( I think), foreigners in which enter Us borders have to wait at the immigration centres. Bush has not taken advice from many people.
2007-01-12 17:36:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Fair, not because i don't support him because i do. I respect the man and his office and the difficulties of his position. I rate him as fair because i don't feel he has driven the this country like a true leader. He has played politics with the war and has let public opinion drive his decision making. He has not led the people.He has let the people lead him.
more reasonable questions please.
2007-01-12 17:40:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by nick w 2
·
1⤊
3⤋