It has been shown time and time again that he is not really smart enough for the job, he has a stubborn streak will not admit even when he is wrong such as even when he takes the blame for things such as some mistakes made in iraq he never admits a mistake the first election he was appointed by the supreme court and we let that stand, such an important post decided by nine people we should have allowed the one with the popular vote to be president and not let nine people decide it. The second election for the ones that voted for him they have to live with that decision and as we all know as they all say we shall see how history remembers the 43rd president.
2007-01-12 16:48:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by billc4u 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
In the 2000 elections, I voted for Al Gore, but I wasn't bothered that George Bush won. Neither candidate was electrifying. Following the attack on the World Trade Towers, George Bush had the support of all Americans, and most of the world. Even though he soon made references to a "Crusade", and "If you aren't for us, you're against us," I tried to overlook those verbal gaffs. I think the attack against the Taliban in Afghanistan was justifiable, but I had deep concerns about President Bush's arguments for the war in Iraq. I was more swayed by Tony Blair's arguments for the Iraq war than by George Bush, and reluctantly went along with the decision to go to war. After all, George Bush is our President, and he had the benefit of the intelligence of the Army, the CIA, and the British intelligence agencies. I was very disappointed as it became clear that George Bush and his administration cooked the intelligence for the war, and Tony Blair was aware of the deception.
By the election of 2004, I was firmly against the George Bush and voted for John Kerry. Things have have only got worse since then, and with each speech George Bush gives, he just keeps digging the hole deeper.
More than anything, I fault George Bush for failing to use the sympathy and support that the United States received following 9/11, and squandering that goodwill for his own questionable, delusional, and likely criminal purposes.
2007-01-12 16:54:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by DavidNH 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Bush is the President of the U.S.A. And We the people should back our President..Me as a person understands why he is doing what he is doing but a lot of People are blinded to the Biblical part of this war....We the People should all pray for our President and ask for the Lord to be with him in all matter,s And to guide and here and see and understand with The president..I do and I am Her to confess to the world That I have 100% in my Lord and His word,s and I know that the Lord is all in this so I am not worried...Shame own us, You all will see.God Bless the U.S.A. we need it Lord and Israel and all who are confused read revelations...It will tell you all about those who turn their back,s own Israel...What is coming...Wake up America,,,,And thank you Soldiers...
2007-01-12 17:42:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by patricia 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
America is trying to help the Muslim community by providing a safe and free democracy in the midst of their horrible region.
President Bush isn't murdering our troops like the liberal biased media and anti-American liberals want people to think.
Islamicfascists are.
Anti-American Islamicfascists hate freedom and America and have pledged the destruction of America.
Liberals support that.
2007-01-13 00:46:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Feelsgood 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
I totally agree with you. Bush never should have been president. The only thing that Bush cares about is himself! Congress wanted a person in office who could keep their crap stirred up. Before Bush was president, we had Bill Clinton. Clinton was for the American people and not the government. Congress didn't like that about Clinton. The American government wanted to assassinate Clinton because Clinton made peace with all of America's enemies. If they had Clinton assassinated that would have revealed the government just like they did JFK! We need a person as president with a heart, and who really cares for the American people just like JFK, and Bill Clinton!
2007-01-12 16:42:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by George 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
He is truly an embarrassment. I love the argument that he has balls and sticks to his principles. That would be great if they were good for the country, made a bit of sense, were intelligent, thoughtful, worldly, reasoned, well thought out and he just plain knew what the hell he was doing. He doesn't really do that anyway. He sticks to the principles that he thinks his conservative base wants to here. Don't be fooled.
2007-01-12 16:44:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by Truth Erector 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
He's a joke for a president. I don't even know how come he was elected as a president..
2007-01-12 16:41:27
·
answer #7
·
answered by kojackraja 1
·
2⤊
4⤋
Morgan, I think President Bush is right, he is doing what is right, he needs to finish the fight for what is right. As for as Europe, HIllary is your best bet, why not get her to go to Europe and rule your country, she is more fit to do it there anyway. We do not need a commie like that in the US. I Support President Bush and I support ALL our Troops.
2007-01-12 16:39:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by m c 5
·
3⤊
6⤋
here in the US some of us agree with you. i think he is too stubborn for the good of the country. he has divided the country. afgahanistan was a good decision,iraq was not. his diplomatic skills are lacking. his speaking ability is poor. his table manners are not fitting for someone in his position.
2007-01-12 16:40:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by kissmy 4
·
3⤊
3⤋
he is a man that does not bow to the liberal fodder, he has balls, something that democrats lack. And last of all he does not care what Europe thinks about us.
2007-01-12 16:36:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by 007 4
·
2⤊
5⤋