English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Whatever could not be as part, whole, equivalence, uniqueness, limit, link, influence, sensation, origin, derivative, rule, condition, intent and fulfillment could not be unity.

What is your opinion on this statement?

2007-01-12 16:17:26 · 26 answers · asked by The Knowledge Server 1 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

26 answers

Unity is a great virtue/reality. Unity in diversity is also a reality.
Let me put it this way. You should be part of a whole, have equivalence relation with other parts of the whole while maintaining your uniqueness. You must know and observe limits. You should have provisions for links. You should be sensuous, knowing the origin keep deriving pleasure while obeying rules under all conditions with good intent and keep working for the fulfillment of yourself and the mankind.
I think, you are good at riddles.

2007-01-18 22:39:02 · answer #1 · answered by Kakoo 2 · 0 0

It is far too complex to be taken seriously. The many different meanings of each word render the statement as a whole unclear and therefore nearly useless to communicate practically.

You could try breaking it down and making a convincing case for each term one at a time and describe what each one contributes to unity.

(You will find some of the terms to be in conflict with one another, such as equivalence and uniqueness, and you'll have to reconcile the inherant contradictions.)

2007-01-13 04:01:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

i appreciate it as a step in the right direction, unless the intent was to purposefully confuse. if you have a handle on it, and are truly engaged in its truth, then i respect the ability to reconcile it as such. with the english language, however, you are in for quite a bit of study for something as complex as this. i hope you are willing to put quite a few years into it, maybe even a lifetime. if so, then it is worth stating now, so that you may be validated that all of these things are unity, or are not not unity, however you wish to approach it.

2007-01-19 23:43:41 · answer #3 · answered by datingguy 3 · 0 0

All of the words have either their opposite or contrasting in the this phrase, this leads me to believe that it is saying that true unity 'takes all kinds' to make it work. I know it is not the best way to say but it is the best that I can think of.

I think that this is very important phrase since (if I have the meaning right) a truly united world will take all of us to make it work and be a place where we can be truelly 'fulfilled'. Hope this helps.

2007-01-13 04:31:45 · answer #4 · answered by Arthur N 4 · 0 1

You are part crazy, wholey nuts, equvalence unique, limited in brain power, senstaionally weirdo, intently nuts and no fufillment in your unity of brains. I say you are the origin of non unity of brain cells.
Nothing is nothing and your word don't mean anything but jibberish.

The wholeness of the unit isn't a whole unless it is united in a intently fufullment.

You are the fufillment of strange questions.

2007-01-13 04:00:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

HONESTY AND IT THE HEART TO FORM OF STATEMENT....WHAT IT IS FROM YA INNER CORE OF HUMAN BEST FORM OF LIFE WHO KNOWS WHAT IT MEANS IT A STATEMENT IT NEED TO BE MORE OR LESS SOMETIME YOU WONDER WHERE THE WORDS AND THE HEART MIND COMES IN PLAY HONESTY I FORM MY OWN STATEMENT TO BE A FREE SPIRIT NO ONE UNDERSTAND UNLESS IT STATEMENT FROM THE HEART WEATHER IT A HONEST STATEMENT IT CHARACTER OF WHO IT REFERRING TO PART OR WHOLE HALF A STATEMENT















)(#$%^&!@#$%^&!@#$%^&*wsdfghjxcvbnjm@rtyuiksdfgyhujkxcybum nm<>?xcvbnm<>?nm<>??????????

2007-01-20 17:50:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. Unity is the comming together of all the above and man

2007-01-20 19:32:44 · answer #7 · answered by tillermantony 5 · 0 0

abstracted, apart, apportioned, asunder, cut apart, detached, disassociated, discrete, disembodied, disjointed, distant, distributed, disunited, divergent, divided, divorced, far between, free, in halves, independent, isolated, loose, marked, parted, partitioned, put asunder, removed, scattered, set apart, set asunder, severed, sovereign, sundered, unattached, unconnected does not mean there is no affection, attraction, bag, closeness, compatibility, cotton, druthers, fondness, good vibes, good vibrations, groove, leaning, partiality, rapport, simpatico, sympathy, thing, weakness

2007-01-19 14:55:57 · answer #8 · answered by dnumberoneisgoaly 2 · 0 0

The word Bombastic comes to mind!

2007-01-13 00:47:04 · answer #9 · answered by namazanyc 4 · 1 1

Yes my dear, you managed to define the "Universal Truth" in a sentence.

If everyone in the world could realize this truth, it will be a lot better a place to live.

2007-01-13 01:08:14 · answer #10 · answered by Nithin 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers