some bands are but these you have mentioned are not. its a gimmik . like someone said its for shock effect.. nonetheless there both okay
2007-01-12 21:36:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by sepulchra666 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Cradle of Filth isn't. I listen to them all the time.
The band is often perceived as satanic by casual observers, although its outright lyrical references to satanism are few and far between, and its use of satanic imagery has arguably always had more to do with the shock value than any deeply-held beliefs. Nevertheless, Andrea Meyer (the band's first female vocalist on The Principle of Evil Made Flesh) makes an uncorroborated claim in Gavin Baddely's Lucifer Rising (p.211) that she was employed as the band's "satanic advisor", protecting them from the foolish excesses she believes other bands guilty of: "A lot of black metal bands know nothing of Satanism. They like the image and... give proper satanists a bad name by claiming they indulge in sacrifices and drink blood or whatever... Look what happened in Norway... Still, I liked Euronymous. He wasn't stupid - just too extreme. It's a shame that he's dead."
: )
2007-01-12 16:21:06
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mommy To Be in April 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Give me a break. No way. You want satanic, listen to Deicide. Also, listen to old school metal like King Diamond and Mercyful Fate. That's your real satanic music.
2007-01-12 16:37:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by BigJake418 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nope, it is just an act for attention.
2007-01-13 05:16:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by * 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
possibly but i think its manily for shock effect
2007-01-12 16:21:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by mike 2
·
0⤊
1⤋