I'm not so sure that women should be allowed to be president. Women are way more emotional then men and might let our country get taken over by communists or something.
2007-01-12 14:50:13 · 35 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You are a complete moron.
2007-01-12 14:53:00 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9⤊ 3⤋
And how...better an emotional woman than a mama's boy with an IQ of 20.
Besides, women have a knack for getting their way and always win.
And come on everyone knew Hillary ran the show, as did Reagan's wife and I'm sure all the Bush women too...behind every successful man THERE IS A WOMAN!!!!!
The difference between men and women is that women are smart enough to know that they can accomplish something from 2nd place more effectively than if they were in 1st place...and they are happy to do it so long as they accomplish what they set out to do.
Funny but you think you know what is going on...but you never really do.
That is why you shouldn't be so sure that you're not being duped at present, because believe me, you are and big time.
If you are as great a people as you claim to be, you would be showing that through your actions....to the rest of the world...for them to see...instead what they see is what you write here...nothing positive, just hatred and bigotry and you expect the world to admire that?
2007-01-12 15:20:23 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I took a look at your profile and see that you are 14 years old. I'm not going to be patronizing to you, but I'd like you to apply critical thinking to a different point of view:
Let's say that, for the sake of argument, Hillary Clinton runs for President. She is a Senator and she serves on the Armed Forces Committee, including three subcommittees. She's a hawk and she would not hesitate to protect our country in any way necessary. She has worked hard to accumulate all of the knowledge she uses in her job each day. She is considered, by millions of people, to be the most formidable and intelligent candidate we may see in 2008. Okay. Now can you imagine someone that has such power and responsibilities having gotten to her position in the first place if she were overemotional and a slave to her hormones?
When her husband was President she was humiliated in front of the entire world by her husband's affair with an intern in the Oval Office. She handled herself during that entire mess with grace and self-respect, deftly handling indelicate questions from the press and the jokes that were told about her and her husband on every late night show and in every comedy routine that existed for the next few years. But Hillary? She rose above all of that and came out of it not only intact, but eventually becoming Senator of the State of New York.
Not all women fall to pieces because of their hormones or have trouble with every day life because they are too emotional. Certainly not a woman in the position she has risen to. Thinking of Hillary as President having a PMS day and waffling about a critical military matter is akin to imagining a male President surfing porn on the Internet while he's waiting for the launch codes.
2007-01-12 15:58:23 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Contrary to what you think, yes a woman can make a fine leader for our country. Many may find a female to be emotional, but women are also known to be compassionate, which is something the White House is sorely lacking these days!
2007-01-12 15:06:34 · answer #4 · answered by Blonde Ambition 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Well, a male President let the right wing extremists take over our country. And a woman might be better, not so fast to act like a cowboy.
2007-01-12 15:31:56 · answer #5 · answered by some_guy_times_50 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Women are able to serve as president. To me, it makes no difference whether the president is a man or a woman. I will vote for the candidate that impresses me as the most likely to adhere to the Constitution.
One caveat, I am suspicious of any woman running that speaks of "women's" issues. There are no women's issues. We are all in the same boat. Either a candidate will represent everyone, or a favored group.
2007-01-12 14:57:24 · answer #6 · answered by iraqisax 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is up to the voters to attempt to select the most qualified candidate to be president. Gender does not determine this. Look at Condie Rice in her governmental position—does an excellent job under fire.
2007-01-12 14:56:47 · answer #7 · answered by DrB 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
a number of international locations interior the international, consisting of Canada and Britain have had women leaders, so sure almost actually women could run. i'm not confident about Hilary Clinton both, as i'm not American, yet i'm confident she is better than qualified to do the job.
2016-11-23 15:15:15 · answer #8 · answered by dashrath 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, Women is equally important candidate to be elected as a president.
2007-01-12 14:54:57 · answer #9 · answered by Mellesa 3 · 5⤊ 0⤋
Nowhere in our Constitution does it state that a woman cannot be President. As long as she's qualified, and I feel as though she would be the best person for the office, I would vote for her.
Hillary Clinton, I will not vote for.
2007-01-12 15:03:30 · answer #10 · answered by Barry 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Women have the right to serve as president & they should. If you are at least 18 years old, you have the right to vote for the candidate of your choice for any reason you choose, even if the reason is bigotry.
2007-01-12 14:55:37 · answer #11 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋