That is a gay question. It was celebrated as the millenium becuase every thousand years is a millenium. Got it?
2007-01-12 14:08:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Hannah 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
The year 2000 was supposed to be celebrated as the millenium because milleniums are supposed to be eras for change; to offer something greater for this world. Every hundred years, the inventors try to get people involved in their new inventions because a new era offers something new for Americans. The last year of the second millenium was 1900 but the new one will be 3000.
2007-01-12 14:18:13
·
answer #2
·
answered by Dimples 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because 2000 and generally any number that can be divided evenly by 10 seems to have some sort of significance in the human psyche. Even though the year 2000 didn't mark the start of the new millenium, since you know, you weren't taught how to count from zero in primary school.
2007-01-12 15:07:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by Hotwad 980 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it was more symbolic, being the year 2000 the 2000 it was easier for most of the people to link it with the end of the millenium. Also remember most of the people don't know or remember that there was no 0 AD
2007-01-12 14:08:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Juan 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
millenium = 1000 years, year 2000 marked the 2nd millenium
2007-01-12 14:08:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
because millenium is celebrated every 1000 years
2007-01-12 14:12:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by jareck 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it was the most recent millenium. And recent things are often called "new." And so logically, people called it the "new millenium."
2007-01-12 15:19:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by kara-loves-youu 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because in some theories, the 21st century begins with 2000. When we completed 1999, that was the end of the 20th century and 2000 became the beginning of the 21st century. Or, you could say that the 20th century years began with 19XX while the 21st century begins with years 20xx.
2007-01-12 14:15:22
·
answer #8
·
answered by David L 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
good point, it should have been celebrated as the start of the third millenium.
2007-01-12 14:12:17
·
answer #9
·
answered by cowboybabeeup 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
For no other reason then we decided to do so.
In fact, to add to your argument: there never was a year "0", the Earth does NOT take a year to revolve around the sun (close, but not exactly) and Jesus was probably NOT born in 0 (even had there been such a thing).
2007-01-12 14:10:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by clueless_nerd 5
·
0⤊
0⤋