soldiers are in a troop and now tell me its not sugarcoated republican making sending TWENTY THOUSAND TROOPS OUR babies at nineteen and twenty and below thirty to death like he is somebody he bush jr will do this he is god right now our lives are in his hands god bless us
2007-01-12 14:01:05 · 6 answers · asked by sunshine 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
You are correct the others don't obviously read the news right in front of them on their home page eh? ha ha
Well the good news is John is a good man and probably is having flashbacks on Nam? And he drinks a bit much too. so I would expect he is a little daft at best. Nice guy though but in this instance wrong. He was a military survivor from a POW camp in Nam, and he is biased as a Republican as well. But I like his plan to eliminate campaign funds contributed for Federal Elections. However he is very rich it might be easier for him to win with his wifes money eh? So we did not elect John Mc Cain because like Reagan we felt his brain was a little off and we were afraid of his flashbacks and that they would inevitably push the button on someone. No joke true. But sure they want more troops there so we divide and conquer our efforts here. We the people will be under attack with the next election when Bush/Cheney refuse to leave office. And declare themselves dictators and they can do it. But the only prayer we have is Congress,we hope they are not paid off with blackmail, or that they don't do what the last one did, vote him as dictator, and go on vacation for 2 years, after 9/11
www.history.com
2007-01-12 14:56:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
i'm floored that individuals truly believe this crap proper to the former President George W Bush and vp Chaney. i'm by no skill prepared on both guy notwithstanding the reality is that the Iraq conflict had not something to do with oil. i imagine the conflict in Iraq grew to develop into sick-suggested and a nasty theory from day one. that is my theory that W had each and each objective of eliminating Saddam from skill at the same time as he grew to develop into sworn in. i imagine of it had better to do with unfinished organisation from 1991 than the distinctive aspect. The conflict had to be approved by technique of skill of Congress and it grew to develop into overwhelming approved. Democrats and Republicans alike supported the invasion. Then most of the Democrats, whom i love were given the following again and said they have been lied to. BU**SH**! that they'd an similar smart comments via technique of reality the Bush administration. Like each and each aspect else in Washington DC there is a large number of blame to dodge round and this conflict is not any exception. i want for reality and honesty in politics. LMAO! Bush grew to develop into blamed for severe oil expenses too and they began to upward thrust at the same time as Clinton grew to develop into president. If oil grew to develop into the reason of the invasion then all and sundry should be getting gas at round 29 cents a gallon.
2016-11-23 15:09:01 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You were drunk when you wrote this, right? Remember, drugs and alcohol will kill you eventually, but I guess it's ok now and then to get blotto and ask silly questions on Y!A.
When blaming our leaders, don't forget to blame everyone involved. The dems all voted for the war and keep voting to fund the war, so they're for these additions too. Whether it will make a difference or not is uncertain, but all I know is we have to win this war and soon !!!
2007-01-12 14:11:22 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
What level of eduacation do you have? This is not a question. Put down the crack pipe and go back to school.
2007-01-12 14:06:44 · answer #4 · answered by you suck 1 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Ya, whats the big deal. 140,000 are there now.
2007-01-12 14:03:53 · answer #5 · answered by charles 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
anyone?
2007-01-12 14:03:51 · answer #6 · answered by dr schmitty 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋