should the dealth penalty be bought back in to the uk?

Question

rich you're a tw*t...il leave it simple so you can comprehend.... ok??

good one "rage",why should tax payers have to pay for them.

i think there are far better ways to punish them than to kill them,but im not convinced that the jails are harsh enough,perhaps for rapists and child molesters because i expect they get a good *** wooping inside from other in mates.

i have compassion xialou,but for the victims not the offenders.

great answer greyblue!!! :D

stevie,none of us has the power to change it and make it happen,the least people can do is get their opinion across.Free speech and all that.

"Is it any wonder we have ruling classes making all our minds up for us when these are the answers?

Should we bring back the death penatly? FU*K OFF!
While you're at it P*SS OFF to America you freaks!"

dude either you have the intelligence of a fart or weve hit a nerve,either way p*ss off.

erm stevie you ret*rd,read what you wrote "While you're at it P*SS OFF to America you freaks!" you put a "s" on the end of freak...which means more than one?get it?

lmao stevie!you're hoping,you dont hit anything,im only humouring your Sh*tty answer cus im bored!

Answer 1

I believe that when proven all killers, serial killers, paedophiles , and husband/wife abusers should be put to death. An eye for an eye. Other crimes such as theft should be dealt with in a different manner. Imprisonment, but made to work 16 hours a day to pay for their own keep in prison. Why the hell should I have to be taxed to keep them warm, dry and fed, when I work my *** off to keep my kids warm, fed and dry. Do they have to pay for medication, dental, haircuts, doctors, food, heat, hydro, clothes and basic necessities? BECAUSE I DO AND I HAVE TO PAY TAXES TO KEEP THEIR SORRY ASSES. Make them work 16 hours a day to keep them selves in prison. Not the silly minor jobs they get them to do either. Make them work for their life. I have had many family members who have spent time in jail and it is a fu##ing joke.

Answer 2

I was under the impression that a court could still enforce the death penalty for treason. If this is the case, I would like to nominate Mr Tony Blair for causing the unnecessary and unjustified deaths of British troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. I don't think it would be a good idea to allow mobile phones with video facilities into the proceedings, just a simply photo of the duplicitous traitor with a broken neck would suffice.

Answer 3

Paedophilia in itself isn't against the law. an same is going for necrophilia , zoophilia, and so on. could we provide the death penalty to all heterophilias? Your assumption is this can promptly deliver about unlawful or non-consenting acts. I do trust that any one which commits a baby sexual abuse act ought to take delivery of a severe punishment. i'm no longer certain what the re-offending price is. in trouble-free words psychiatrists fairly professional in this field could make those judgements. I do imagine that prevention is truly significant. it type of feels to me that remedy could commence once achieveable for all and sundry who has paedophilic fantasies. And the death penalty or different severe punishment would also be a good deterrent for committing crime. notwithstanding, i do not recognize what number of people would search for help in the experience that they knew the 'remedy' stands out as the death penality.

Answer 4

no the police can`t be trusted .They are under pressure from government targets and expected to get a certain amount of convictions ,Its not unknown for them to tamper with evidence .It`s in the news today that a man has had to be released after serving 14years for a murder he well may not have done .it came out that the police had withheld evidence ,The judge had allowed inadmissible evidence and the verdict was unsafe (They usually only rule unsafe ,so that they are not liable for compo) Any one could be at the wrong place at the wrong time and get blamed for a crime they didn`t do,it can and does happen more than people realise i don`t agree with capital punishment ,but what right has anyone got to sentence a person to death if theres the smallest chance he/she could be innocent .DNA is often irrelevant and tests due to human error not always reliable
capital punishment was abolished years ago as there were more reasons to stop it than there were for it to be allowed

Answer 5

There are probably some offenders who deserve to die for their crimes, but the UK laws, courts and processes are so flawed and inefficient that there would be mistakes made, so I would have to say no - unless someone can come up with a way of ensuring the people found guilty really are guilty.
It would still make more sense than ASBOs though.

Answer 6

No. Fallibility in the system means too many innocent people would be executed before exoneration. Moreover, if one really believes in punishment, life in a tiny cell is far worse. The cost factor to the taxpayer is always an issue, but overall, the death penalty should remain banned.

Answer 7

I think so!! But only should be used if there is without a doubt the person is guilty!! But then again I wonder if the death penalty is a reward rather than a punishment, because for me if I were ever to be convicted of a crime and I had the choice of the death penalty or life in prison (or even 20 years) I would choose the death penalty! Obviously I know you can't choose, but my point is i'd rather be dead then spend much of my life in prison!!

Answer 8

I'm for the Death penalty. I think there are a lot of people who are a waste of life. I support it to make that statement to those people rather than as punishment.

To warn the English, Illinois and Texas has both been caught executing an innocent man. If you start bringing it back, make sure its done right, rather than allowing hate mongering yahoos to take over the scene.

Answer 9

good question only a question for people with intellegience...

even though i think some people dont deserve to live....its a hard tricky one as one to be person can be given a unfair judgement to loose their life...

so i have to say no for the fact those who judge are human and h uman are not always right in judgement....

i do think there should be a harsher punishement other then sitting the rest of there life in jail living off money we work for everyday to eat sleep and ****...like normal

Answer 10

it would b contrary 2 the Humans Rights Act, so unless we back away from Europe that seems very very unlikely.
as any1 can c right now, the deterrent of prison doesn't seem 2 b working, it could b a good idea 2 show by example.
if u kill, u stand a chance of being killed urself.
definitely 4 paedophiles and serial rapists.
some people can't b fixed.

Answer 11

As an American I would say no. I'm not opposed to the death penalty, some people deserve to die. But it's not worth the trouble, appeals and controversy. Just lock the suckers up for life.