IM DOING A PROJECT FOR SCHOOL ON A HISTORICAL FIGURE AND WONDERING IF HE COUNTS
2007-01-12 13:40:39 · 6 answers · asked by happy wednesday 22 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Music
Probably not, but he should be. If you do decide to go with him, there's a show called Final 24 on next Thursday, it's about his last 24 hours of life I guess.
2007-01-12 13:43:27 · answer #1 · answered by Swirlgirl 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Sid Vicious is merely in call for by way of fact of his point presence and his looks. He exchange into an poor musician. The intercourse Pistols under no circumstances recorded yet another good song after Vicious joined the band. He exchange into the down fall of the band. even though, Vicious did define the punk attitude. He did not supply a hell approximately all of us or something. He merely did in spite of he felt like doing, no count how wild and loopy that element exchange into. and that's punk rock. yet an icon? No. i might evaluate Rotten to be greater of an icon than Vicious.
2016-12-16 03:21:28 · answer #2 · answered by lacy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Infamous, not historical. He is overratted- Johnny Rotten all the way (again- not historical).
2007-01-12 13:58:49 · answer #3 · answered by live75 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
don't even question it!!!!!!!!!!! Sid Vicious was a master and a father of punk and many grate musicians take allot of inspiration from him and the sexpistols.
2007-01-12 13:46:52 · answer #4 · answered by Frankly 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on how convincing your project is, I'd assume.
2007-01-12 13:45:14 · answer #5 · answered by eric_aixelsyd 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hmmm i don't really think so. he was a drug addict who alledgely murdered his girlfriend....
2007-01-12 13:45:18 · answer #6 · answered by ♠ JƏSSƏ'S GiRL ♠ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋