one small step for man...... one giant leap of mankind
2007-01-12 13:32:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by gg 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
In my opinion, that would be 1989. That was the year the Berlin Wall fell and the Cold War ended. In a very real sense, that marked the end of a period of hostilities which started the day the Archduke Franz Ferdinand was assassinated in 1914. The events surrounding the end of WWI set the stage for WWII, and the events surrounding the end of WWII set the stage for the Cold War.
2007-01-12 16:09:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rick N 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
~For what, for whom and in what way?
'29 wasn't bad because of the stock market crash and all the reform that followed because of it.
'19 was pretty good because the Treaty of Versailles was signed, directly leading the rise of Adolph Hitler and WWII and giant strides forward in technology caused by it.
'63 was good because Jack Kennedy got wasted and LBJ was able to escalate, rather than end, Nam, which in turn spawned the social awareness and reform of the 60's.
'68 sucked. Absolutely nothing good came during or as a result of the Nixon years.
2007-01-12 17:26:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Oscar Himpflewitz 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1918:
It saw the end of world war one which meant the end of the Russian, German, Austro-Hungarian, and Ottoman empires. It created the League of Nations which became the United Nations. It set the stage for the next World War. The war encourage leftist and rights movements in the former imperial colonies to begin the fight for their Independence.
2007-01-12 14:05:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The years are numerous, Hitlers death, Stalin's death,the emperor of Japans death, Kohomeini's death, the ousting of idi Amein, the capture of Sadam Hussein, the year old man bush was defeated by Clinton, the year Nixon fled the white house in shame, and last but not least the year that Thomas Jefferson et al introduced the Declaration of Independence hip hip hoorah
2007-01-12 13:44:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
1946. 1945 was too bloody to be a good year.
2007-01-12 14:13:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by megalomaniac 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1979- because Smashing Pumpkins made a song about it.
2007-01-12 13:38:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Q-mann 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
It relies upon on what you recommend by technique of "in simple terms proper." between the exciting (and sorta unhappy) issues about literature interior the twentieth century is the separation between "severe" literature and "primary" literature. most of the writers propular with a usual reading public were not seen "tremendous" or perhaps "good" by technique of literary critics and, accordingly, are literally not studied in faculties nor given prestigious awards. on the different hand, most of the "severe" writers, which includes James Joyce, John Barth, a lot of Faulkner, T. S. Eliot and his followers, are seen too "puzzling" by technique of the final reader and resisted by technique of maximum pupils in faculties. Is there an author who speaks to and for the individuals yet who also appeals to critics and meets their extreme psychological criteria? Like Charles Dickens and Mark Twain and Walt Whitman and Emily Dickenson and George Eliot interior the 19th century? probable not, a minimum of no individual has emerged to take the lead in our way of existence at this factor. per chance Toni Morrison, and her predecessor Zora Neal Hurston, come closest. Their works are deep, yet also deeply shifting. They communicate to the information and to the middle. They communicate for his or her own human beings and for all and sundry, their own lifetime and continuously. They advantages learn in college, diagnosis by technique of critics, AND reading for excitement on a summer season vacation. If Salman Rushdie's later works were virtually as good as useless night's little ones or if extra of John Irving's works were like Prayer for Owen Meany, i ought to forged my vote for them. they have taken "magical realism," (which, i imagine, is the suitable "form" to strengthen interior the twentieth century) and made it readable for the usual public, they have blended humor and drama (as Twain and Dickens did), their books are web page turners yet they go away you with a large number of themes to replicate upon, and per chance maximum important their characters live to inform the tale on your mind's eye lengthy once you've finished reading the e book. So, the in simple terms proper author? probable Toni Morrison. the in simple terms proper unmarried e book? useless night's little ones by technique of Salman Rushdie.
2016-11-23 15:06:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by fuchser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
1945 - the world was freed from the threat of Adolf Hitler.
2007-01-12 13:41:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by irish1 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
1955
dodgers beat the yankees
2007-01-12 13:36:42
·
answer #10
·
answered by dc 3
·
1⤊
0⤋