and has anyone seen me watch
2007-01-12 13:13:02 · 15 answers · asked by technotoe 1 in Social Science ➔ Economics
Enough.
(and your watch is next to my keys.)
2007-01-12 13:21:22 · answer #1 · answered by idahoturkey 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wealth is a concept of stocks and assets, so it is not just money that changes. You could find an Inuit living in your house, as that is an asset. Indeed, your watch could well end up being owned by someone in Africa. However this question is ridiculous as it is impossible to put a monetary value on everything- how do you redistribute grass for example? Things also don't just magically redistribute, there are costs involved,such as transporting things around, and as such, wealth has to be recalculated.
2007-01-12 13:30:39 · answer #2 · answered by samuelll 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"Household wealth in 2000 was valued at $125 trillion, equivalent to about three times total global production, or $20,500 a person, according to The World Distribution of Household Wealth report" (London Times).
2007-01-13 12:35:39 · answer #3 · answered by Fences and windows 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I don't know what we'd all have but I can calcuate precisely what it would be worth, nothing. You couldn't buy anything or sell anything, nor hire anyone. I'm assuming it would continually be divided so that any trade you made that increased your share would result in a redistribution.
2007-01-12 15:03:25 · answer #4 · answered by Roadkill 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Eventually none since no one would work very hard if they knew the result of their hard work would not go to them.
2007-01-12 13:16:39 · answer #5 · answered by jimdpr 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not much, leave the world alone as it is.
2007-01-12 13:17:36 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It has been estimated at 50 cents. That's why it won't happen. Where did you last see it?
2007-01-12 13:16:19 · answer #7 · answered by poppy vox 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Every one "nearly" every one would have a chance to make changes.
2007-01-13 05:10:41 · answer #8 · answered by seesunsuf 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
probably not much! First answer is most likely right.
2007-01-14 19:17:52 · answer #9 · answered by rose_merrick 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What does it matter...for the GREEDY it still wouldn`t be enough!
2007-01-12 13:22:29 · answer #10 · answered by ella915824 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋