We have an 18 year old water heater that is leaking for the second time. Last time the plumber came out he said the it was illegal and not up to code to not have a "release valve" on it, and it never should have passed inspection or been installed. (This law requiring the valves has been in place for longer than that I was told).
My question is, since the original installer of the water heater is out of business, I can't sue them for damages. But, shouldn't the city govt. inspectors take the responsibility for this mess and pay for having it replaced? I don't know, but I assume they approved it when our house was built (it was all built at the same time when the water heater was installed). This doesn't seem right, and now I'm stuck with a dangerous and costly repair. Thanks.
2007-01-12
12:51:25
·
6 answers
·
asked by
someoneoutthereishere
2
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
Thanks for the answers.
We are the original owners, so it was installed only once for sure. My main issue is the safety of it and how the main safety feature (release valve) wasn't installed, which is required by code (and was at the time, I looked). Since the city did approve this, and it is potentially extremely dangerous, it seems that they should be held responsible. It sounds kinda silly, but these things can be very dangerous....
http://www.waterheaterblast.com/
http://www.waterheaterrescue.com/pages/WHRpages/English/Longevity/hot-water-heater-safety.html (under 'Temperature/pressure relief valve (T&P)')
2007-01-12
13:16:23 ·
update #1