and all you had to do was to order a few bombs dropped, would you? Here is the catch, the bombs are not nuclear, and civilian death tolls would be around 500 at minimum
2007-01-12 11:52:35 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Why did the fire ants get mad? Because we poked, prodded and drained their anthills. Why did the fire ants destroy two of our ant hills? To seek justified revenge. Let's burn the fire ants anthill! Oh wait, the ant hole is valuable to us let's rebuild and make a democracy! Moral of this story : Don't mess with the ant's home and he won't mess with ours. Some will never learn and that's why we have ants in our pants.
2007-01-12 12:42:49 · answer #1 · answered by twiggysrevenge 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
My answer is no,international law yada yada yada,you know my mantra but fact is it would happen and I wouldn't be too sad about it.Dresden had a deathtol of 300 000 civilians and I still think that was worth it to stop the Nazi's.
That does make me a hypocrite but I can live with that if alquaida is seriously crippled
2007-01-12 12:19:30 · answer #2 · answered by justgoodfolk 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No for the same reason I said no to your earlier question. How do you think the families of those 500 would feel ?
I wouldn't be surprised if thousands of those related to those 500 that died joined Al Queda's because of it.
2007-01-12 12:00:31 · answer #3 · answered by IRunWithScissors 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Al-Qaeda would not exist, it hasn't ever existed. the call replaced into made up by technique of the CIA because they necessary a attractiveness to grant the "enemy" so as that the usual public ought to actual be brainwashed into concern and hatred on the very factor out of it.
2016-11-23 14:58:18 · answer #4 · answered by schifano 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a New York minute. Even at a 500 minium loss that's still a lot less then the loss we are incurring staying in as long as we have.
2007-01-12 11:59:22 · answer #5 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it pisses me off how Bush says that he can't go into Pakistan and get Osama because there a sovereign nation. But yet Iraq is a sovereign nation and that didn't stop him ? Bombs away.
2007-01-12 12:10:03 · answer #6 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, killing innocent civilians to get your political message across is what terrorism is all about. If we did that we wouldn't be any different from those scumbags.
2007-01-12 11:57:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
What is the point? We'd have to upset our new payrolled dictator-friend in Pakistan.
2007-01-12 11:59:36 · answer #8 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
YES. just dont think about all the wittle babies would be killing and you'll be ok....the babies are just gonna grow up to be terrorists anyways
2007-01-12 12:29:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have let our special forces do their jobs and have gotten him at Tora Bora. Rumsfeld took a pass on that one and he is still on the loose.
2007-01-12 11:56:22 · answer #10 · answered by Dark Helmet 2 · 4⤊ 1⤋