2007-01-12 11:29:27 · 20 answers · asked by protocols 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
Hell no. Unfortunately, a lot of his sheep will be bleating praise to the maniac.
2007-01-12 11:47:45 · answer #1 · answered by Joe 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Quite SCARY to read the comments of some here...
I mean those who would destroyed the entire world for the so-called safety of America. Saying that, you turn youself into some sort of "American taliban".
I heard that, in most countries in the world, a great majority of people think Bush is more dangerous that Bin Laden. Even in Great Britain! Reading so comments here makes you understand why and how much of crazy extremists some of us have become.
By the way: there is no such thing as a winnable war.
Especially war on terrorism can only be LOST.
The only option for the USA to survive is to look for peace and let others live their lives, instead of wanting to destroy the entire world!
2007-01-12 12:35:41 · answer #2 · answered by s0190331 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No i do not support it but i can see where he gets his ideas from the responses you have received. I served in Vietnam and you know how that war went we were not welcomed home as heroes, instead just the opposite and that was a war that could have been won because we had an enemy that we could see unlike the war on terror where anyone from any country in the world could come here and do lots and lots of damage for one to see the truth of that all one has to do is see how many muslims there are in the countries of the world and then tell me that we are safer fighting them over there than over here. Bush like his cabinet are all hawks and that is their only solution to any problem and to the rest of the world we come off as bullies and paranoid war mongers, a fine reputation to have. As for the religious right they are in the middle cause they finally have someone in office that seems to be making sure that we hasten Armagedon
2007-01-12 17:49:11 · answer #3 · answered by billc4u 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. It is Iraq all over again. People, American people mainly, are being told about the vileness of Iran's leader and the danger that Iran poses to the safety of everyone. Is this not deja vu? Does no one in the US see the parallels with Saddam and Iraq?
It is a disaster.
2007-01-12 12:01:44 · answer #4 · answered by Webber 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I support Assalism. Feed it, powder it, and wash it well. You'll need it in good condition for the up coming events for this future. Swim! "Here comes a flood"! Jump! The dammed earthquake! Hide! The Tornado! Drink Water! The Drought! Face Mask! SARS! Get the point. I've fed mine, now I'm going to wash it.
Good Luck w/ yours
2007-01-12 11:42:28 · answer #5 · answered by Mae W 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Idiot in chief is right! No I am against expanding his war against those that have yet to attack us, I would support all out efforts to go after bin Ladden and his gang of Saudi thugs however
2007-01-12 12:28:40 · answer #6 · answered by paulisfree2004 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
it is fantastically extraordinary, as a results of fact Bush replaced into waiting to persuade Russia and China into helping sanctions against Iran And so far Obama has no longer been waiting to persuade Russia and China to help sanctions against iran. and shall we no longer neglect North Korea, who Bush had close down their nuclear weapons software and nuclear reactors and permit international inspectors in to be certain. Then Obama makes a decision to permit them to restart the two courses lower back and has no diplomatic talks in any respect.
2016-12-13 04:24:53 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Little boy, did someone take your favorite toy so now you are mad at the world? Name one thing stupid that the President did (and back it up with cites and facts, not just your worthless opinion)!
Iran has ALREADY attacked the US! The president of Iran was PERSONALLY involved. Iran has threatened to wipe out Israel (which has done NOTHING against Iran).
What do you think we should do?
If it is the draft you are afraid of, you can always run to Canada, they welcome cowards.
And then when a Democrat President gets into office, you can come back!
2007-01-12 11:57:28 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
I didnt know Kerry had drums. I knew our commander-in-chief was. You think we will not one day have to face them? Do you think if we turn our backs and not solve the problem, every problem will simply disappear? Do you think Iran is innocent of dipping its hands in the Iraq situation? Sometimes we have to fight. I hate war, we all do, but sometimes we have no choice. Why? Others want war. If we dont fight, we may lose. Bush is not ust randomly picking countries to war with, there are obvious reasons. Afghanistan: former home of Al-Qaeda, Iraq: Former helper of Al-Qaeda and former holder of Saddam, Iran: Current president is trying to build nuclear weapons, presumeably to target Israel and possibly to give to terrorists, has fighters in Iraq to spark civil war, Syria: Haven for terrorism as well, aided Saddam, has fighters in Iraq to spark civil war.
2007-01-12 11:37:18 · answer #9 · answered by Daniel 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋
"IDIOT-in-Chief!". If GWB graduated from Harvard, learned to fly jets, owned a major league sports team, was governor of Texas, and is now a second term President of the greatest country on the face of this earth....that should make a you lesser than an idiot. Yes, I support eliminating all our enemies. I guess you want to "love thy enemy"...until he slits your throat for not believing in Islam.
2007-01-12 12:03:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes. the thougt of Iraq with nuclear weapons shoud have all of us beating drums.
2007-01-18 22:31:15 · answer #11 · answered by pnn177 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋