2007-01-12 09:37:17 · 15 answers · asked by george w d 1 in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
NO , Idi amin and banda are worse
2007-01-12 09:40:56 · answer #1 · answered by Jaffa1700 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He Mugabe needs to swing from a tree. He is evil. He is probably worse than Sad-am was. He has killed countless of people, beats woman senseless and he idealises Hitler. Evil , evil little man.
2007-01-15 04:21:01 · answer #2 · answered by Duisend-poot 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes - and I WISH THAT THEY WOULD FIND OIL IN ZIMBABWE.
Why ???
Because if they did then Bush would 'suddenly realise' what an evil man he is, then would undoubtedly launch an offensive to 'Stay the course to bring peace democracy to the people of Zimbabwe.'
2007-01-14 05:24:15 · answer #3 · answered by David 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yes, he's an ****. If America wants to regain international respect, they should nuke him.
Most of the other African leaders are also prats. Look at the mess their countries are in.
The only way to sort out the shambles that is Africa, is for the British to run it. As soon as we gave them independence, it went to pot.
2007-01-12 09:55:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Np, but he's getting there. Saddam was the worst in recent times.
2007-01-13 05:05:15 · answer #5 · answered by Beau Brummell 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
statesman is a understatement- more like a dictator
2007-01-12 21:34:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bush, Putin are worse
2007-01-16 06:23:27 · answer #7 · answered by Conservative 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean head of state, I think Saddam probably beats him on points.
2007-01-12 09:41:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Robert Mugabe cant be that bad.because no African leader.has got a bad word to say about him.but they had plenty to say about smith.and hes a angel compared to Mugabe.
2007-01-12 09:50:10 · answer #9 · answered by peter o 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
I wouldn't call him a "Statesman".
2007-01-12 09:40:32 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋