Before i go deeper into the question, let's first state the following things, to prevent discussion about God, evolution theory and science. It's a thought-experiment so it doesn't need to be factual.
OK, lets state that:
1. Its 2907
2. Evolution theory is real and accepted
3. We have created a device that can create 2 other universes, but causing the destruction of our own.
4. Scientists and philosophers agree that the meaning of life is: To create two universes and take survival of the fittest to a universal scale.
5. When the universes are created ours is destroyed, but the two new will be filled with human dna, so that our species will thrive in two universes
6. String theory (and thus multiple universes are real)
Ok then, the questions are:
I: Could the meaning of life be a godlike creation of new universes?
II: would anyone want this?
III: Can survival of the fittest be a intergalactic issue?
A lot of reading, but I'm interested in your answers!
2007-01-12 09:36:39 · 8 answers · asked by Dutchthor 3 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Two things occur to me:
- the scientists agree that the meaning of life is to create life but they have to destroy life to do it. They value one kind of life more highly than the other, thus putting two different values on the concept of "life", because they value the life they will create more than the life they will destroy. How would the scientists explain themselves if indeed they derive meaning from giving life?
- Creation as meaning in itself is the basis for all of life. Fecundity is the operating principle in the creation of all living things. In one way, you've already answered the question. Life is. Perhaps it is only humankind that needs to see it as meaningful, because animals just accept it as the nature of existence.
I apologize for not delving into your science-fiction scenario more -- the question is intriguing on a multitude of levels, and I could write for hours if I had the time to explore things further.
Thanks for the question --
2007-01-12 10:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The meaning of life is the creation of life only to those who dedicate their lives to the creation of life.
I. I don't believe the meaning of life is to create new universes.
II. Why would we want to create 2 new universes if it meant the destruction of our own? First of all, the creators would not live to see their creation. Second of all, we'd all be dead just to give life somewhere else...
III. Suvival of the fittest can be an intergalactic issue, if the two universes are directly involved with eachother. The universe more fit for survival will indeed out live the lesser of the two, but it is also possible that the two universes co-exist side by side with each other
2007-01-12 09:43:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Based on conservation of energy, the two new universes cannoyt have as great a maximum mass-enegry as out present universe, therefore both are lesser.
2007-01-12 11:08:13 · answer #3 · answered by novangelis 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all...can I just say...that all those who use Yahoo! Answers as a platform to thrust their religious beliefs on people with legitimate questions is quite lame (ie. "Well...I don't know about you, but I believe in God so...ummm...he created everything...and ummm...I know that cuz that's what I have always been told....and that's my answer to everything...and it allows me to never have to ask questions or think for myself in my life.").
Anyhow....
A: While I think the meaning of life is different for everyone, I would have to say for myself that the meaning of life is more than just blind contentment and faith. For me, it's about taking a step back...looking at life....asking questions like these...and finding my own answers.
The meaning of your life all rides on what you decide to do with it.
2007-01-12 10:12:41 · answer #4 · answered by iNeviTable fuTure 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe in God the creator of all. I find my answers to life in the Book of Life. The Holy Bible tells us all we need to know. I have a close walk with God and may I suggest that you turn to him for your answers? God Bless Brother.
2007-01-12 09:39:53 · answer #5 · answered by Shayna 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have to admit on this one; you're way beyond me, so giving an intelligent answer is impossible for me at this time.
Have you ever considered being a {sci-fi} writer? You would be great at it. No kidding, and no sarcasm; you'd be great!
2007-01-12 09:48:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You should write a Sci-Fi book.:) Good Luck.
2007-01-12 09:41:15 · answer #7 · answered by mld m 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Are you Carl Sagan's illegitimate child?
2007-01-12 09:45:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋