English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They want a "liberal" plan for vistory after Bush hit the iceberg.

2007-01-12 08:58:34 · 5 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government Politics

I meant victory of course.

2007-01-12 08:59:08 · update #1

Wow! "Stome K" below is now accusing liberals of sinking Bush's war ship??? As though anyone besides Bush, Cheney, and Rumsfeld has any say in the entire matter. What was that song "Its just an Illusion".

2007-01-12 14:35:48 · update #2

5 answers

I don't understand this myself. He's the self proclaimed War President, he called for this war and convinced others by using means fair or foul...why should the liberals come up with a plan. It's his mess, he should clean it up.

2007-01-12 09:05:35 · answer #1 · answered by Sun Spot 4 · 0 3

Well let me answer your question with a question in the same manner you asked yours in.

Why did the far left sink the Titanic that is the war on terrorism before it even left Harbor?

For almost 4 years I have been listening to "Quagmire!" "WE ARE LOSING!" "VIETNAM!" even before we had one boot in the ground. The far left never once gave the situation a chance and are still not doing so.

has anyone in the far left actually gone and talk to the soldiers in the field or the commanders or the people in Iraq? NO! they only look for the people that agree with them and say "THAT'S THE PROOF WE NEEDED!"

Give it a God damn rest OK?

Screaming far left rhetoric does not prove you right, it does not fix the problems and it sure as hell does not make the war end sooner.

Maybe if people like you actually contributed to the situation in creative and thoughtful ways maybe the war would be over sooner.

all your doing is making noise and looking like fools, Just so you can pretend you have some kind of Moral victory, when you really don't.

2007-01-12 17:13:56 · answer #2 · answered by Stone K 6 · 1 0

Apparently they want someone to blame for Bush's war.

2007-01-12 17:03:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

maybe money, they don't want to lose there jobs for following an idiot and " carrying his water" for the past 6 years. i see it as either lie your *** off or lose your job or maybe both

2007-01-12 17:03:03 · answer #4 · answered by sapace monkey 3 · 0 1

You mean neo-cons can't raise the Titanic by themselves?

2007-01-12 17:02:02 · answer #5 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 0 2

fedest.com, questions and answers