English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I have heard that WGA can allow microsft to kill your computer remotely.(they have nearly shutdown my roomates XP system until he did a automatic update.we did not allow this update for two week until the computer was extremly slow) Does microsoft have the technologies to disable someones linux box? I fear a EULA disallowing someone from runing linux on the same home network that WinXP is hooked up to. They already put a 5 computer limit on your network(winxp pro has a 10 computer limit).How can they get away with telling you how many computers you can run?I talked with a microsoft rep and she told me that each computer does not have to be running a windows product and that there is a 5 computer limit per license on a single network. So if I put up a new web server my room mate would have to buy a second licence even thought Im not using a windows os.

2007-01-12 08:47:30 · 6 answers · asked by meltdown_override 2 in Computers & Internet Computer Networking

6 answers

Microsoft was no authority to tell a user what platforms can coexist on a network with theirs. they also do not disable other platforms, that would be hacking and would result in probably the largest class action law suit in the world...

2007-01-12 08:54:36 · answer #1 · answered by lv_consultant 7 · 1 0

How do you outline chance? And who determines if linux is a "chance" to Microsoft? The chilly puzzling data is that a lot of people change from abode windows to linux, from workplace to OpenOffice, and so on., or maybe as they do, Microsoft looses money. I did precisely that, and Microsoft will under no circumstances back get a penny of my money. Microsoft would not care - they are doing truly no longer some thing to win back people like me, yet keep taking position the course of transforming into overpriced bloated application. Flash video games could carry out an same on Linux, mine do. in the experience that they don't, there's a project which includes your browser, flash deploy, and so on. attempt a unique browser. attempt updating (or downgrading) flash. The terminal scares you? locate concepts on the thanks to apply it. it is your pal. it may assist you a lot in case you learn some terminal instructions. you'll quickly locate concepts on the thanks to do issues that you won't be able to do in abode windows. My spouse makes use of linux, and he or she would not recognize a toaster from a mouse. it truly is not any longer puzzling to apply, and is suitable should you only favor digital mail, information superhighway, and letter writing, and so on.

2016-10-30 22:50:10 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Oh, yes, Microsoft pays a huge staff of employees to look at your whole network. If they see linux in any form they remotely scramble your registry so the computer won't work anymore. Oh, and they read and delete all your e-mail, too. Excellent question.

2007-01-12 08:52:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If your network server is running Linux it is subject to the limits of THAT license and if you are running the open source version you should not have any limit.

I don't know if any of the commercial versions of Linux have limits but I wouldn't think so.

Just don't expect much cooperation from MS if you run into some network problem if your server is non-MS.

2007-01-12 08:55:59 · answer #4 · answered by Gary 3 · 0 0

WGA is invasive, and many tech advice lists say do not install.
MS cannot remotely do your network. But they can force you to shutdown things by legal means.
Just remove WGA.

2007-01-12 08:51:39 · answer #5 · answered by Mictlan_KISS 6 · 0 0

yes

2007-01-12 08:51:44 · answer #6 · answered by kurticus1024 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers