why do LIBERALS claim that they supported afghanistan Invasion?

Question

thats a lie. at the time they were calling that a "war for oil" and were against it.

now the claim they are for it? another flip flop? and a global war on terror? they claim iraq wasnt a good choice but want a more global war. seems like theres a lot of terrorists in iraq. i dont think redeploying to japan makes a lot of sense general murtha, lol.

what other countries do we go into liberals? u are in favor of invading pakistan to search for bin ladin? u are always complaining about saudi arabia but are in favor of invading them?

ur plan is to do nothing right?

Answer 1

I'm in favor of denying morons like you the right to vote for other morons.

Answer 2

Real American, these kinds of questions (from Dems OR Repubs) just highlight how ignorant of the issues and the FACTS regarding those issues you truly are.

Afghanistan was never about oil. It was about capturing and bringing to justice the man responsible for the attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon, Osama Bin Laden. Do you remember Osama Bin Laden?

Our President, who cares SO much about American security, sent only 14,000 troops into Afghanistan, where there were and ARE terrorists, terrorists who have sworn to wipe both Israel and its "puppet", i.e., America, off the map, a country with terrorist training camps; but sends 140,000 into Iraq, which had never attacked us, never THREATENED to attack us, never allowed Taliban training camps in Iraq, nor did he support or harbor ANY international terrorists. DOMESTIC terrorism? Ok that Ill buy, Ill even buy the fact that Saddam had to go, for gassing his own citizens- but not because of WMD, not because he or his government was a threat to the US. How would you feel if we had a bunch of US citizens fighting each other (not like how we all get along here in Yahoo Answers) and all of a sudden another country just decided to invade us to make us stop? Would you roll over and start learning their language or would you take up arms and RESIST THE OCCUPIERS?

What Hussein did was posture, making himself look bigger and tougher than he was, standing up to the US and the UN, the same thing ANY little guy does when threatened by a bigger guy, so as not to appear weak to his neighbors.

Finally, I have a question for you. Have YOU ever served in the Armed Forces? If so, good for you, you and I are brothers, even if we dont happen to agree on this issue. If not, then either join or keep your advice about troop deployments to yourself. You have no training in military logistics so you have no credibility.

The cute little catch-phrases like "Flip-Flop" and "cut and Run" are just shortcuts to critical thoughts. Stop being a stooge and start thinking for yourself.

Answer 3

The polls read 80% for and 20% against, same as Bush's ratings. That's a lot of democrats switching over. So invading Iraq was a great idea, how's it going. 30% for and 70% against. hmmmm that's quite a few repuglicans switching over. My plan is to set back and do nothing until Jan. 2009 and we have both houses and a democratic president to straighten this mess out.

Answer 4

I was, and am still for being in Afghanistan, at least until we capture Osama bin Laden I don't remember a "liberal" backlash on invading Afghanistan ,our country was united in supporting that effort. There was much more protesting over invading Iraq (hundreds of protests across many nations) than there was for invading Afghanistan.(1 protest in NY)

We should be committed to getting bin Laden for he is the mastermind of 9/11. IF we had focused our efforts on Afghanistan and not had shifted our efforts over to iraq, we probably would have permanently removed the Taliban from that country, dealt a much more effective blow to Al-Qaeda, and would have captured bin Laden.

Answer 5

We did support the Afghanistan invasion, because that's were the Taliban who supported Al Quada who attacked us on 9/11 were.
There is no oil in Afghanistan that I know of. There were few terrorists in Iraq before we invaded. Our invasion actually created a terrorists stronghold. You will not get away with historical revision.

Answer 6

You state - No conspiratorial solutions or claims Thankyou. And what surpassed off after that? contained in the Western international you may purely speculate what surpassed off after in accordance with information publicizes, tabloids etc etc till you could come into contact with the electorate of Afghanistan you'll likely not in any respect have the real fact as to what surpassed off after, however you develop a idea upsetting question. The Taliban do not characterize all of Afghanistan similar because the IRA do not characterize Britain or the recommendations of maximum human beings in Britain. in case you want fact do something inventive like getting this question translated and observe in case you get a reaction from different inhabitants. different components might want to be those who've carried out service available, contained in the protection rigidity, wellbeing workers etc etc yet then you will be getting their fringe of the tale purely. destroy the question down. What surpassed off after? To whom do you propose? The Taliban?, the U. S.?, the innocents interior Afghanistan whom probable needed no component to this warfare, alongside with a mom raising a gentle baby, a husband attempting to provide for his relatives, perchance a student basically left college with grand recommendations of a destiny who's now guaranteed to helping his relatives rebuild their lives after seeing their village devastated with information from a US attack. Or do you propose the Western households whom suffered the shortcoming of loved ones in strive against? or perchance you propose what surpassed off to the commercial equipment of Afghanistan, or the USA of a and the knock on impact on relax of the international. Whom received the most advantages from this invasion? What were they? A u . s . a . would not flow to warfare till for some earnings often economic. Who has made the most money, which organizations, are they nonetheless profitting? Why are the Taliban nonetheless offended? What are they somewhat offended at? Whom has sufferred the most losses as with the aid of the this warfare? who continues to be sufferring? What surpassed off after? practice serious questioning to the question, get better inventive. Ask the right inquiries to the right human beings and perchance you receives a glimpse of the fact. best of success such as your essay.

Answer 7

Afghanistan was connected to 9/11, Iraq was not.

There is no oil in Afghanistan.

You are sadly mistaken.

Answer 8

Agreed. The liberals wonder why we're not catching bin Ladin, and then I see on my news scroller that a soldier died in Afghanistan on a raid for terrorists. We are going after bin Laden, and we will catch him. We can't pull out of anywhere until we do.

Answer 9

I have to defend the senseless buggers on this one. I didn't hear much complaining about Afghanistan from libbies.

Answer 10

I guess I was in another dimension at the time. Where I was, everyone backed the Afghanistan invasion.
So, how did it turn out in your dimension?

Answer 11

Don't push the liberals into a group who think the same about EVERY SINGLE ISSUE.