2007-01-12 08:03:15 · 6 answers · asked by Diesel Weasel 7 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
I was going to say yes, but I really think that both of those things are of the same value. I'm not sure why, but that's my thought.
2007-01-12 09:01:05 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, I don't think so. because there are certain things I value that are uncertain to me now, but may not be in the future, so I cannot say for certain.
2007-01-12 18:32:27 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Excellent question. Let me answer that question..... ummmm......with an answer.
I guess it all depends on what each individual person thinks. Collective thought negates the importance of any given thing. One can only view what is certain through ones own eyes.
2007-01-12 16:19:05 · answer #3 · answered by sean1201 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No, that is why we risk for the more valuable. Risking something is uncertain by definition.
2007-01-12 16:28:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
it depends on who is asking and what "that " is. different people have different views and what one values the other may not so i don't think there is a correct or incorrect answer to this question.
2007-01-12 18:38:21 · answer #5 · answered by ~*These Blue Eyes Tell No Lies*~ 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what "that" is and who is attributing "value".
2007-01-12 16:10:42 · answer #6 · answered by trer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋