they have no idea who the enemy is unless they're getting shot at?
2007-01-12 08:00:12 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
is this a polish joke no wait i know put halve of the 35 million on one side the other half on the other side then have the 160,000 be referees and let them go at it until they decide enough is enough or drop a nuclear bomb on there asses to even the odds
2007-01-12 10:44:22 · answer #1 · answered by outlaw 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It will be target practice for the Muslims for-sure, What the American people may not be aware of is most of the troops during the past 4 years have keep themselves away from the Iraqis as much as possible. The Marines & Army troops face populations in orders only! They can not have any effect being claim by the same original propagandist as the WMD crap at the begining etc.
2007-01-12 08:04:24 · answer #2 · answered by bulabate 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
First the 35 Million is a skewed variety. basically, because there are 35 Million human beings does propose they're going to all strive against. also there are literally not 35 Million guns in Iraq for the Iraquis to apply. And the 20,000 US troops are nicely educated with air help and solid artillery. So the the 20,000 troops can help to stop a civil warfare from putting out.
2016-12-02 04:23:56 · answer #3 · answered by mrotek 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We have already lost and this isnt a gd football game where we can score 3 touchdowns in the last 5 mins to win if we are lucky. These are people's lives American as well as Iraqi's, this won't work it hasn't worked in all of history and will not work now. This has everything to do with buying time to make things look like we have won in some way or another to save a failed president's legacy. It's a shame some of you people do not care enough about our troops or those innocent people that are being caught in the middle of this that you can't admit that your vote in 2004 was wrong and you picked someone who is taking us down a long road of blood and lies.
2007-01-12 08:35:50 · answer #4 · answered by 33 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
From now on the only Militia that is going to around are going to be the dead ones! And, it is about friggin time!
Note to all Iraqi's lay down un-lawful arms or get ready to meet Allah!
Fun time's over!
2007-01-12 09:30:52 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not a conservative so I wont try to answer but I think you should give extra points if the answer refers to the point that America had 165,000 troops in Iraq in 2005.
I also think you should deduct points from answers that suggest adding American troops to an area and then dropping nuclear ordinance on it.
I don't know if you have the authority to do this but I also think you should require people that prefer returning troop levels to 2005 levels over a phased withdrawal to write condolence letters to the increased casualties' families.
2007-01-12 08:09:53 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Mind Control. The troops are just a diversion like the psychologist watch.
2007-01-12 08:11:38 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Were I a conservative expert I would be happy to answer.
2007-01-12 08:29:12 · answer #8 · answered by LadySable 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What's your plan for victory, is it just pack up and leave or is it send more to get the job done. Admit it, no matter what the man does, you're going to say its the dumbest move ever made. It's become a reflex reaction for you guys a this point.
2007-01-12 08:11:02 · answer #9 · answered by Whootziedude 4 · 0⤊ 3⤋
One word:
ordnance
2007-01-12 08:23:23 · answer #10 · answered by Frank B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋