Do you think we should pull out or keep going?
Do you have any loved ones over there?
My cousin is there. :(
2007-01-12 07:43:35 · 13 answers · asked by sabby 1 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I think we should send enough troops so we could be spread evenly accross Iraq and I could see a fellow Marine in any direction I look!! God bless your cousin, click the link bellow, read the caption and you'll see why I fought.
2007-01-12 08:02:18 · answer #1 · answered by Centurion529 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I think Bush is doing the right thing by sending more troops over to Iraq...as long as he uses these new troops properly. I am seriously considering enlisting. The age limits have been upped. I can still go over if I so choose.
2007-01-12 09:01:44 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Bush did Admit Live on TV he made a huge Mistake on how he handled this War and He now needs to Send more Troops over their to fix this mess.
Anyone Who gives me a Thumbs down, I guess didnt watch Bush or hasnt been Following Bush and Dont truly know what they are talking about.
Bush Messed Up Hard and is trying to fix it.
To bad Thousands of Our Troops along with Innocent people had to pay with their lives.
See Its always like this, We have Rule After Rule After Rules that need to be followed during war. Its just like anything we do, A police officer has so many Damn rules, In MA a Police officer Cannot Draw his Weapon unless he is in Harms Way Or AFTER he sees someone pull their weapon.
Now ask yourself this, DO the CRIMINALS with Bad intentions have any Rules to follow ?
2007-01-12 07:52:26 · answer #3 · answered by slimb20413 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is 100% usless!!!
If 150,000+ can't get the job done, not even close. Then what is an extra 20,000 going to do?
Come one, think for once in your life instead of the TV tube telling you what to think.If They wanted to fix the problem they need to send another 200,000 troops and put 100,000 just in Baghdad alone and turn it into a complete police state.
The only way to win Iraq is to make it another US state. You can't fight it and at the same time give it back.
2007-01-12 08:23:03 · answer #4 · answered by aorton27 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for my section i don't think of he's sending adequate troops. Your opposition approximately slaughter shows which you're disconnected from certainty. 3000 squaddies in 3 years constitutes between the right invasions from a casualty point of view ever. If Bush is there to thieve the oil the situation is it? No information that even one drop stolen different than on your delusion innovations. you're greater suitable particularly clueless on Somalia. we've not attacked Somalia, we've bombed terrorist camps in help the government's very own try against antagonistic to terrorism. you recognize i don't call particularly some people terrorist sympathizers, yet you relatively in super situation the bill based on the particularly incontrovertible certainty which you will not have the capacity to or won't know desirable action antagonistic to those animals. the in consumer-friendly words blind man or woman I see marvelous it is you. Uzlu2919: not all of us disagrees with Bush. Kindly state your man or woman comments, yet end attempting to communicate for some element else us. charlzy: comparable answer as above. i'm American and that i do help the action. communicate for your self and not for me or each physique else. Dex: Semper Fi and thank you on your provider to this massive land of ours.
2016-12-16 03:07:33 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He knows it won't work.
It's a political game he's playing. Daring the Democrats to pull funding. If they do, they "hate America" and love terrorism. If they don't the reason they look weak, because they said they'd work to stop the war.
Bush will win this round. The troops will die.
Unless our congress can grow a pair real quick.
2007-01-12 07:59:35 · answer #6 · answered by Jimbo 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
what about the troops that are over there already will the new troops help them ?I dont know what he is thinking but I do know that war is a tricky thing.. 2 of my bothers were there and the wierd thing is they both thought it was a good thing they went but they did believe it was because of oil..
2007-01-12 08:07:55 · answer #7 · answered by GrassRootsRabbits 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have said it before it's time too start backing out we have done our job well and accomplished so much. Need to chase these terrorists around the world and take them out. I have thought that making mobile strike teams that can go on a moments notice anywhere wherever they find these monsters and take them out.
2007-01-12 10:20:56 · answer #8 · answered by L J 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's easy for Bush to try sending more troops. what needs to be done is he himself needs to go out there and fight....
2007-01-12 07:52:50 · answer #9 · answered by Jacinda 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it sux and I also think that Nancy Pelosi will fund every cent requested for it.
2007-01-12 07:54:14 · answer #10 · answered by A Toast For Trayvon 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋