As time passes are there things we should change and things we should keep from changing and do we sometimes get the two confused to the point where we're dead set against changing some things that we really should change and dead set on changing some things that we really shouldn't change, and should how we decide those things be based on preserving what will keep the world at least as good as it and keep it from getting worse and changing in what ways will make it better then it is without inadvernently making it worse as a side effect and we need to keep perspective for the right now and the distent future so we don't make changes that are good for right now but bad for the distent future, they'd need to be good in all time frames and shouldn't we take everyone, all human beings, lives and happiness, fates and fourtunes into consideration when thinking about it and we can't know all that stuff unless we truly know it accurately, in whatever way accuracy is accurately determined?
2007-01-12 06:48:54 · 4 answers · asked by Stan S 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
That is a very long one-sentenced paragraph!
2007-01-12 06:52:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I think it's jsut about the worst run-on sentence I've ever seen.
2007-01-12 14:52:57 · answer #2 · answered by JD 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
When in doubt, ask your mom what to do.
2007-01-12 15:15:33 · answer #3 · answered by QueenA 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Make up your mind. Have faith.
2007-01-12 14:53:22 · answer #4 · answered by Gummy 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋