if the world was run by women,what would the world be like today?

Question

just a question from a male

Answer 1

It would depend on the intelligence and personalities of the women concerned and those around them, much the same as it is at present with the men! (Let's watch Angela Merkel!).

Answer 2

My guess is about the same, becuase women just like men have different characteristics. There are those of us who are compationate and caring and want to everyone they can, there are those who would rather be led than lead, and then there are those of us who are assertive. It is the most assertive men that get into office, and the ones that are leaders. The assertive women who are leaders are only different in appearance mostly. Have you ever seen a women who is determined to get something accomplished, just like a man she is a go getter. She knows what she wants and she does it. Just like her male counter part. Look at war, we have women in combat, has the militeria really changed much because of it? I mean do you see flowers in the bunk houses and Martha stewart tipe decore, the answer is no, because these women have a different agenda.

Just as women can be assertive so can men be compationate and caring loving and giving, not to say that the president is not any of these things, but he is a fighter and go getter. If you had a man there that delt soley on compassion he would be a basket case right now.

So again, my answer is the world would really be no different.

Answer 3

If the world was run by women there would be no War on Iraq because women feel no need to be the Alpha male in every situation. Also I think there would be much better education everywhere because that's what women think about. Men seem to think only of fighting and the egos. No offense to any men or anything.

Answer 4

Either way, male or female dominance is not good. Yin and Yang, light and dark etc. You need balance. Females are good at emotional stuff, but are not as capable of hard, emotionless logic, and vice versa for men, you see, they compliment each other.

A world run by females...there would be loads of wars, as females do not have the capacity to stop them, but have a great capacity to start them (PMT). There would be lots of pretty pictures on Yahoo, but the programme might not work properly. Children would be more unruly than they all ready are. Governments would be overburdened with a system that did not work because women would try to assist everyone individually through law. The courts would be overburdened for the same reason. Women would try to do a great deal of good for society, but would run out of money as, in truth, there isn't enough money to do the good that is needed. Men would do the exact opposite of the things listed above.

Women do not have the ruthlessness necessary to make nasty decisions, men are too ruthless, so things like, the reasons behind a child's behaviour would get overlooked.

Answer 5

Men and women are the same is some aspects.I think the more appropriate question would be what if the world was not run by complete assholes

Answer 6

Pretty much the same as it is now. Despite what all the feminists and women's lib people like to think, a "woman" is just another "human being", the only difference being "women" bear young and "men" can't.

The basic need to survive, to protect their "own kind", to provide a safe place for themselves and their children, to discover new things, to question and learn are still there and still govern the actions and minds of women as it does men. The ONLY difference between a male run world and a female run world is who passes on the family name.

~~ Abaddon

Answer 7

Does your kid complain about moist or dirty diapers? Can your youngster pull down his or her pants and pull them up again? Then begin the potty training and for a rapidly good results you want to use this method https://tr.im/ypkdh so that you can potty train your child in only 3 days.
This plan is very valuable system, it outlines an array of established techniques developed to support your kid achieve potty training achievement in record time!
By ordering Start off Potty Training, you and your youngster will take pleasure in the enjoyable side of teaching and obtaining this essential skill. As this kind of, potty training can even be fun making use of this broad assortment of strategies that have been effectively honed.

Answer 8

Subtler. Nothing would be out in the open. No one openly acknowledges this, but women are more intuned with emotions, generally then men. In being more intuned, it's easier for us to manipulate it. I think you would see a lot of smoke and dagger type politics.

Just think evil high schoolers on a much larger scale.

Answer 9

There would be no war ... only VERY serious discussions, every 28 days ...

Men would not be allowed to eat gas-producing foods within two hours of bedtime

All toilet seats would be nailed down

For basic training, soldiers would have to take care of a two-year old for six weeks

All men would be forced to spend one month in a PMS simulator

Singles bars would have metal detectors to weed out men hiding wedding rings in their pocket

Men would have to get Playboy for the articles because there would be no pictures

Men would get reputations for sleeping around

Men would be judged entirely by their looks, women by their accomplishments

During mid-life crisis, men would get hot-flushes and women would date 19-year-olds

Answer 10

I wouldn't worry too much they would either all be dancing around their handbags in Parliament or all go to the loo together at social events and on nights out!