Doesn't that seem a little fishy?
2007-01-12 05:54:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
because they are personal friends of the bush family, and with that comes priveleges. that is my response regardless of any conspiracy theories that they may have been involved as part of their investments in U.S. defense contractors, which is a valid thing to debate, but either way, they got to fly because they're friends with Bush.
chuckles, it wouldn't have been weird at all for the FBI to stop everyone named bin Laden from flying after 9/11... I'm not sure if you noticed, but they stopped everyone who WASN'T named bin Laden from flying
2007-01-12 05:58:15 · answer #1 · answered by Aleksandr 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sorry this is no big secret. The bush family and the bin Laden family were proven to have been in connection with each other in business dealings. Below is an unbiased source.
EVERYTHING bush does seems fishy, and the results always stink for the American people.
Chuckles D : The source has no connection with Moore. I don't much care for him because he comes off " Cheesy ", but a liar he is not.
To test your comment about all the people with the bin Laden name. Below are the results that listed. You may be surprised. It's not even close.
2007-01-12 14:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by AngelWings 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always wondered that too because the FBI wasn't allowed to interview them. I would bet that since most of them have renounced Osama that they were not involved, and that they were moved out to protect them from reactive violence (some of them are personal friends of the Bush family). It would have looked better if the FBI got to talk to them first .
2007-01-12 13:59:42 · answer #3 · answered by Peter H 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. There are hundreds of people with the bin Laden name. Can you imagine if the FBI would have stopped every McVeigh from traveling around after OK?
Also, they were not secretly flown anywhere. Michael Moore is a liar.
2007-01-12 13:57:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
No, no reason they should not have been afforded protection. They cut ties with the lunatic long before his role as 2nd in command came along. Can you imagine the possibilities? Nothing to see here....
2007-01-12 14:03:49 · answer #5 · answered by Rich B 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
To protect them. Think about it - does Jeffery Dahmer's sick crimes make his family guilty too? We are each individuals and we make choices, good or bad. Too many here would have harmed those family members even though they are only family in name and not supporters of Osama.
2007-01-12 13:58:22 · answer #6 · answered by lifesajoy 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
they're rich, the rich get privileges like that.
2007-01-12 14:02:11 · answer #7 · answered by croato87 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
1. I didn't know they were. How do you know that if it was a secret?
2. Your brother decides to join al queda...Should you be punished because of his crimes?
2007-01-12 13:58:30 · answer #8 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 1⤊ 4⤋