2007-01-12 05:27:07 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports ➔ Wrestling
If you want entertainment, then opt for the WWE. If you like
technical wrestling that focuses on the sport aspect, not the
entertainment, choose TNA. It depends on what your cup of tea is. david c is an example of how ignorant WWE fans can be.
Jeff Jarrett doesn't own the company. It's owned by Panda
Energy International, who are represented by Dixie Carter, who
is basically the daughter of one of the owners.
sendmyapologiestothechef is another example of a WWE mark.
These are exactly the kind of fans the WWE caters too. If you
like soapopera/tabloid BS type wrestling, then WWE is for you.
If you're more of a traditional wrestling fan, then the choice is
TNA. Samoa Joe, Kurt Angle, AJ Styles, Petey Williams, and
the stars of the X-Division are just some of the examples of
guys who know how to actually wrestle. Cutting a good promo
can only take you so far...Hulk Hogan and Dusty Rhodes are
prime examples.
2007-01-12 05:30:01 · answer #1 · answered by Answerer17 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
TNA great wrestling, give me a break. I watched them for a few months, and I thought it sucked. All filler, no action. What are you people watching. I didn't see an ounce of technical wrestling. All I ever saw was thumb tacks and some chump named Konan ruining the whole show. How many times can you give Sting a title shot and he is never on the show. What's with that? Sure he is on the ceiling, but damm is he ever going to wrestle on TV. And everybody knows Jeff Jerrett, probably the only talent there, ownes the company. That's the only way he could become a champion. Give it a rest already. TNA just sucks.
2007-01-12 17:02:51 · answer #2 · answered by david c 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
TNA. Wrestling is about matches and performing. Not skits and kissing the Chairman's bare buttocks. Every large corporation was small at some point so don't sleep on TNA. They show as many matches in 1hr as the WWE does in 2hrs. WWE is nothing but Baywatch in a squared circle!!
2007-01-12 13:48:03 · answer #3 · answered by WHEELJACK 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
wwe has more drama and acting going on tna yes it has some but they just get to the wrestling which the only disadvantege the tna has aginst wwe is that the wwe has to shows so its more matches then on tna in a week
2007-01-12 15:45:41 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They're both terrible. TNA is just decent at best. Wrestling Society X might be pretty good, it will start airing on january 30th on mtv
If you want to watch wrestling that is actually entertaining and actually cares about fans, buy some TNA dvds, they are pretty much what ECW was in 1995, amazing underground wrestling.
2007-01-12 14:09:19 · answer #5 · answered by Scott Justice 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
TNA
they have the x-division, kurt angle and are getting rvd and sabu
I admit wwe are better at the moment but they have to watch out because tna are only a couple of steps behind and could overtake wwe anytime soon.
2007-01-12 13:37:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
WWE for sure TNA may have some wrestlers from WWE but that doesnt make it better how long has WWE been around they are the best ever, the past proves it and TNA just plain SUCKS even with angle christian (HAHAHA hemme) cuz TNA SUCKS NO MATTER WHAT and i hateTNA because they think they can take away the spotlight from the WWE but they can't no they can't
2007-01-12 13:48:51 · answer #7 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
It depends on who you are asking. Personaly I like WWE but a lot of people like TNA. I guess you need to watch both and decide for yourself.
2007-01-12 15:33:36 · answer #8 · answered by kim_in_craig 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I'm a long time WWE fan, but I'm going to go with TNA.
2007-01-12 14:08:20 · answer #9 · answered by Your Maker 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
TNA superstars is insane ppl cause they bring the danger to themselves
thats why i choose the wwe where the technical wrestling is
2007-01-12 15:33:11 · answer #10 · answered by T-mac1_4life 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋