who belives that america should just nuke teh mountains of pakistan to kill the terorists?

Question

then what should the US/ coalition forces do?

Answer 1

Not everyone living in the mountainous areas of Pakistan is a terrorist. How many more civilians need to die from US bombings? Besides, the US in not at war with Pakistan, do you suggest it get involved in yet another conflict?

Answer 2

Or terrorists just nuke Washington? Same result. Depends which side of fence you're on. Don't think a nuke is the way, especially in a mountainous area. There is a lot of blast shelter in a mountain region, that is why the usual fighter carpet bombing method has been ineffectual. There is a method behind Bush's madness. Like it or not, ground troops are the only way.

Answer 3

Do you seriously believe that there is an isolated group of people on this planet that can be located in a single area such as "the mountains of Pakistan" (by the way, are you referring to the Himalayas, the Hindu Kush or the Khyber Pass?) and "nuked"?

Think about it, the Greeks just started firing anti-tank missiles at you! The Greeks! The last people they got pissed off with were the Romans! I'd be careful though because losing to Allah's army is one thing but I wouldn't be so keen to take on Zeus at the same time.

The suggestion is ridiculous. Do you think that the solution to your problems is to "nuke" people? Don't you realise that the vast majority of the world's population has suffered at some stage or other in recent years as a result of the greed, arrogance, illegality and aggressive stance of American foreign policy. Your enemies can't be pin-pointed because your government have fostered enemies for the best part of the last fifty years.

Get rid of George Bush and the his corrupt, corporate driven administration and replace him with an intelligent leader, Hillary Clinton seems like a reasonable enough choice for the time being, and perhaps people will stop feeling that blowing themselves up in order to hurt you is a reasonable thing to do. That's how much you've pissed them off. It's time to say sorry and leave them alone to sort their own problems out between themselves regarding the legimitacy of the House of Saud and the evolution of the Nation of Islam. Unfortunately, they're not going to let you steal any more of their natural resources so I'd advise you to encourage your leaders to focus a bit more on developping renewable sources of energy. Instead of proposing dropping nuclear bombs on a region that is essential in terms of providing drinking water to a region comprising over a billion people perhaps you should consider suggesting that we use nuclear technology as an alternative energy source to petrol and other carbon emitting fossil fuels that are destroying our environment. Maybe then millions of people the world over will stop wishing you were dead and you'll have less to feel paranoid and angry about.

Just a suggestion.

And to tweakk : "guess what, we dont belong there! we're not the middle easts 9-11 line."
You f****** invaded the place and nearly three-quarters of a million innocent people have died as a result you moron. But you're right, you don't belong there. You don't "belong" in the region.

Answer 4

Amaizingly enough: it may not work very well. Afganistan and Pakistan have serious mountains that will make nuclear explosions ineffective. There will be survivors. And unfortunately, those survivors will be not women, children and relatively normal guys that live in the cities and villages, but the ones who hide in the caves deep in the montains (the ones you wanna annihilate).

There is no really quick fix for the problem.

Answer 5

I beleive we should bomb the **** out of pakistan. Not with nukes tho. A full nuclear bomb detonated in the middle east will make temperatures drop by ten degrees all around the world. So , nukes no. Bombs, **** yea.

Look. I know alot of you conservatives are hung up on iraq. But guess what, we dont belong there! we're not the middle easts 9-11 line.

Answer 6

No, because there is still innocent people trying to live there, I think the troops should just go home now. Should Middle East just bomb America because of the troops in their countries? No its not feasible, everyone just needs to deal with their own countries. No matter what you do there will always be enemies. So just try to live in peace with them.

Answer 7

Isn't that overkill? Laying huge tracts of land to waste just to take out what amounts to a handful of terrorists? How about pulling the troops out of Iraq, letting those ungrateful savages bash it out themselves, and moving the troops to the Afghanistan/Pakistan border for a few months to flush out Osama and his buddies?

Answer 8

Yes, I believe so. We need to stop listening to liberals and political correctness. Leaflet the area, possibly, for the sake of the innocent and to give them time to get out.

Bombing should have also been done in Iraq since we went there, instead of sacrificing our own troops. That's why I'm opposed to sending more.

Answer 9

I don't think that would accomplish much in reality. How about we go over there and have a big beer keg party & get em all drunk then beat the crap out of Ole tally ban?

Answer 10

Makes as much sense as nuking California to get rid of gang bangers.