Why does the Aryan Nations call Saddam Hussein a martyr? He was certainly no saint. He was no freedom fighter. He was a Muslim and probably not even a good one. Oh and by the way, I do not believe he was white either? Could anyone explain how this makes sense? right now I myself believe that it does not make sense at all and that is probably because the Aryan Nations also does not make sense.
2007-01-12 02:19:36 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ History
Understand, true Aryan's are originally from IRAN. Most Western caucazoid band-wagoners don't even know this.
They are claiming him and placing him on martyr status because they are running low on heros. Hilter was the only figure head for so long and another was needed to help keep there movement going. Most aryan ideas and symbols are stolen from other cultures which is why they only pray on weak minded individuals who are not intellegent enough to do research and find out the truth. Typical caucazoids believe anything written and taught to be the gospel truth.
2007-01-12 02:43:22 · answer #1 · answered by BionicNahlege 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK, now I get the question.
When one group of people make a martyr out of some one, as we have done to Hussein, it does not mean we think he was a saint, or a good guy. The point is that by killing him so ostentateously we create support for the guy among maniacs that then join the cause against us. We would have been ever so much smarter not to hang him but leave him in prison.
But doing things the smarter way is not the hallmark of this administration's policies, if you haven't noticed...
2007-01-12 05:28:18 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now I myself believe that your question does not make sense at all.
Of course Saddam wasn't white - but what does that have to do with anything ?
.........and who are these "Aryan nations" that are calling him a martyr.
2007-01-12 02:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by the_lipsiot 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How ought to assisting a frequently happening assassin ever be "moral" (except, for sure, interior the eyes of politicians who stood to line their wallet nicely from such institutions)? I heard there replaced right into a image circulating on youtube a number of years in the past that confirmed a image from 1991 of Osama bin weighted down sitting at a picnic table at Bush's Crawford Ranch in Texas. Ten years later, he's international Enemy #a million. If that image replaced into genuine (i ought to by no skill discover it), what the hell truly is going on?
2016-11-23 13:55:54 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well it makes as much sense as someone asking a stupid question that has been so redundant on here that it has lost its usefulness on this site!
2007-01-12 02:28:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋