If bush wants to pick fights with so many countries should americas"allies" just tell bush to go it alone?

Question

then we might not be so quick to instigate war with north Korea/china or iran/syria

Answer 1

If bush want to pick your brain how powerful would the microscope have to be????

Answer 2

Besides the UK, America's allies have given very little material support to recent conflicts. So, I don't think the US would be bothered by the 'Go it alone' syndrome.

I also think that concerns that the US will instigate war with North Korea, Syria or Iran (why on earth would the USA instigate a war with China who is the world biggest trading ground with a centralized goverment dictating consumer drive? It's a capitalist's dream!) are unfounded as the United States simply does not have the resources (men, money and materiale) to start and support another large engagement.

Answer 3

Firstly "Irak" was a minimal threat to the Us and certainly not worth the death of more than 3000 American soldiers not to mention 50000 injured and the 100000 to650000 dead Iraqis depending who you believe. Given the lies told and there are many more to emerge yet I dont think the allies should support this effort until Bush and every one of his co-conspirators is charged in line with their crimes. His administration will prove to have been a sad day for the American People.

Answer 4

Charles, do you ever get any sleep?

Last I checked, Saudi Arabia, Jordan and Israel(throw Turkey in the mix as well) all want the crazy Mullahs and their front man Ahmadenijad eliminated...

China, Japan and South Korea would also like to see Lil' Kimmy out of the picture....


America is hardly "alone"

Answer 5

We are not at war with North Korea. We are not at war with China. We are not at war with Iran. We are not at war with Syria.

So what is your point?

BTW: I didn't vote for Bush.

Answer 6

No thanks. those ideas were truly traumatic to me, "for the time of Bush's presidency, unemployment replaced into low, GDP replaced into extreme, shopper self assurance replaced into extreme, gas and oil expenses were low (except at the same time as the Democrats led to grease to leap to $one hundred a barrel for a short era) and usa's status interior the international replaced into extra ideal than it ever were. " in case you probably did not be conscious there replaced right into a global recession that began on the right of Bush's presidency. The presidency has little or no administration over the booms and busts of our risky economic marketplace. also, who cares if oil is costly? If the U. S. truly had to be a pacesetter, we are able to make oil expensive and pour extra elements into gaining skill independence. i'm confident also be bowled over to study that the international at tremendous likes Obama as president. no less than our president isn't given the German Chancellor again rubs interior the approach G-8 conferences.

Answer 7

No, none of what you write makes sense and it's a shame that you have this psychotic need to constantly bash the President. Must be a very deep-seated psychosis.

Answer 8

Yes...if the U.S. wants to pick fights with other countries, leave those countries who don't want to get involved alone. Allies or not.

Answer 9

Bush has a huge coalition, and more in line to join him daily, its over whelming, his admin is turning them away in flocks

Answer 10

I cannot imagine why anyone would want any of these insane rulers to go nuk a lur.

Answer 11

You are probably right. But we are good at twisting arms so we get Brunai to come along!