Почему делать Американский вспомогательный глагол для образования сложных времен к пробовать к быть грамматический определенный член лучший все время? Быть он высшая отметка за классную работу Фаллос вещь?
I personally think so but what do you think?
2007-01-11 23:53:37 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
Of course theres always:
Why do アメリカン have 謀る 付き be 醍醐味 二六時中? Is イット アト ファリシズ・物件?
Opinions?
2007-01-11 23:54:38 · update #1
To Chownrott - the Babel system takes literal words without taking into account any colloqialisms of region and/or dialect. You are close with the translation as some of the words translated but the MEANING didn't translate.
Actually that was part of the point of the question
:~)
2007-01-12 04:26:54 · update #2
You make a very strong and wise point, but are you SURE about the "образования сложных времен к пробовать к быть грамматический " bit?
Perhaps you would rather rephrase this to "образования сыло к бтьжных вн к пробовареметь грамматический "? Well I think so anyway.
2007-01-12 00:23:12 · answer #1 · answered by profound insight 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, it translated to ~
Why to make American auxiliary verb for forming the complex times to to try to to be the grammatical definite article the best always? To be it is the highest mark for the class work phallus thing?
(according to yahoo babel)
Which doesn't make a lot of sense to me. Could you clarify the question?
***Edited to say -
I think it's probably just like anything over the internet - you can translate the words, but not the meaning behind it - you can't translate humor, sarcasm, annoyance etc. So, even if I knew the words, being as they aren't my native tongue, I could completely misinterpret what you say :o)
(Look forward to you telling us what it really says soon not that you've gotten my curiosity up lol)
2007-01-12 00:43:48 · answer #2 · answered by chownrott 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Er....biosecurity?
2007-01-13 10:18:26 · answer #3 · answered by *shine* 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i totaly agree with u but perhaps u can think about it again
2007-01-12 00:14:42 · answer #4 · answered by monalisa three 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I totally agree with you.
2007-01-12 00:48:14 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You know very well that you cannot say otmetka 3a...... It is very rude of you !
2007-01-12 02:17:04 · answer #6 · answered by Social Science Lady 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Now you've confused me even more!
2007-01-11 23:57:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think you have it in a nutshell!
2007-01-12 02:12:55 · answer #8 · answered by Mother Hen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What did you say?
2007-01-12 00:00:15 · answer #9 · answered by tulip 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well personally, I think SHIRGNDBFGIRBVJXBNCAOSENFJFBJFBJKBFGIANGIBDVJZBDJFBGIRBGJDFGBJDBFGIISDGNKBGJDBIZDBFGIZDBFGI
Should be illegal.
2007-01-12 00:48:05 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋