2007-01-11 22:27:20 · 17 answers · asked by Ashley 3 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
No.
One year monogamy, Two rounds of tests 6 months apart, and totally open communication about any possible backsliding on the monogomy (and I mean totally open as in details of activities). Then Yes.
Otherwise, treat all sexual partners, relationship or otherwise as if they are positive and you have nothing to worry about.
2007-01-11 22:34:03 · answer #1 · answered by rehobothbeachgui 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I wouldn't probably trust a recently-met-potential-partner, but in a long term relationship, I guess I'd know if my partner is HIV+ or not.
If you don't discuss HIV status with someone, then you can assume they are avoiding the topic.
Ultimately, you are responsible for your own health, so if you choose to have unsafe sex based upon what a guy tells you either way, in the heat of the moment, then you are being a fool.
Remember that, if a guy honestly had an HIV test a month ago and was negative, but then had unsafe sex since then, he might be positive and not know it, since the virus needs time to incubate before it shows in some tests.
To be safe; always wear a condom, or never exchange bodily fluids.
2007-01-11 22:42:41 · answer #2 · answered by Kedar 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
I don't trust anybody. Before i even think about having unsafe sex both me and whomever it is i want to have sex with both go to the clinic to get tested. it's free and the test for the enzimes as well as for the disease and i still go once a year even if that's the only person i'm with.
2007-01-12 00:45:40 · answer #3 · answered by kaluah96 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I cant answer this question more than i could give my story.
I and my Partner have been together for 2 yrs. When I first met him we always used condoms at his request. There were times we talked about going bare back, and I even begged him to Nutt insode of me. Just thought of having his babies inside me got us all excited, but he said he hadnt been tested in 2 yrs prior to us meeting and he didnt want to take any risk. Well he just got checked last July and was diagnosed HIV positive. Thank God we did play it safe.
2007-01-12 01:37:53 · answer #4 · answered by david s 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That would depend on one thing.Proof.An STD test.But that doesn't guarantee 100% that they are negative.So, trust has to be very high to consider that.Also, HIV is only one disease to worry about.There is also hepatitis and a list of other STD's.So, trust may never be enough.Safety should always be the first concern.Trust a partner that earns that trust.That is my policy.
2007-01-11 22:44:46 · answer #5 · answered by BuckFush 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't even consider unsafe sex until after at least a year monogomous and a couple of tests together.
2007-01-12 01:06:52 · answer #6 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Does groping ball sacks classify as unsafe sex? If so, then YES!
2007-01-11 22:34:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i never believe in what a guy says
he could have blood test results there and i still would not have unprotected sex with him
safe sex is better then killing your self over sex
i think even is i was married i would not have unprotected sex
as can you really trust any body
2007-01-12 01:48:28 · answer #8 · answered by Zara3 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Even if you think that he/she is trustworthy, you can never really know. It can take up to 10 years to detect AIDS. So better safe than sorry. That decision is literally a life and death decision that people take for granted...DON'T... AIDS IS AN EPIDEMIC.
2007-01-11 22:37:54 · answer #9 · answered by EmpressLaydi 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. The safe thing would be for both people to get tested together.
2007-01-12 02:26:52 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋