Pete Sampras, Roger Federer or Andre Agassi. Although I root for Roddick, i still dont think he qualifies as of now
2007-01-11 21:55:37 · 27 answers · asked by eDREAMS 2 in Sports ➔ Tennis
Pete Sampras, Bjorn Borg, John McEnroe are legends. Agassi mada an impact not as trophy collector, but more of a great sportman, interesting biography and a roller coaster career.
Right now in my opinion, Roger Federer is on he way to plant his name as one of the best. Hes not yet at the level reached by Woods or Jordan. but given time and space, Roger will be hauled as a legend in the tennis world in years to come
2007-01-11 22:10:19 · answer #1 · answered by kyoshinrei 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Since the athletes you mentioned are American, then I would say Pete Sampras. Agassi might be a household name but Pete accomplished a lot more than him. Roger Federer is an excellent player and he is the best right now but he has not surpassed Pete Sampras' accomplishment yet.
2007-01-12 03:28:58 · answer #2 · answered by just me 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Roger Federer
2007-01-12 01:47:56 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Andre Agassi
2007-01-11 23:16:52 · answer #4 · answered by Sara 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
shall we seem at it by technique of awards & titles: Jordan; 6 Titles 6 Finals' MVP's 5 usual Season MVP's Woods; 14 Majors Victories sixty 8 PGA excursion Wins 15 international golf Championship Wins 36 eu excursion Wins truly, i'm a basketball fan and that i need to grant the nod to Jordan. My rationalization for giving him the nod is in simple terms because of this. Jordan's been to the Finals precisely 6 situations and received precisely 6 situations. also, once he were given to the Finals (with the Bulls) he by no skill lost and continuously went again. He had a three-peat from ninety one-ninety 3 then retired for ninety 4&ninety 5. He then made a comeback and had yet another 3-peat from 96-ninety 8 and retired on correct. Woods has been attractive two times from a important journey. in simple terms in accordance to that, i ought to ought to grant Jordan the nod. both are out of the elementary athletes and tops between their activities respectively.
2016-11-23 13:39:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say Andre Agassi,he's a more household name and everyone knows him...but...there are other tennis-players that can overcome his talent and achievements...Roger Federer is really good,but i would say-also-Rafael Nadal9he crushed Federer last year and he was only 19!!!)
2007-01-11 22:13:43 · answer #6 · answered by UknowUloveMe 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i wish roddick/blake would be but nope sorry im gonna say federer ... agassi had a nice career fans loved him ... sampras was not a loved man but it will be pete or roger.
2007-01-13 03:47:30 · answer #7 · answered by question man 911 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Roger Federer and Pete Sampras. They're the best of all time. (In my opinion)
2007-01-12 13:48:53 · answer #8 · answered by KYZ 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
roger federer. he won 27 matches in 2006 the most by any tennis player ever. thats 27 matches in a row. there have been a few other tenis greats to win more than twenty but the next person on the list is rod laver who won 26 matches in a row back n 1964 i think.
2007-01-13 00:08:19 · answer #9 · answered by bluring2000 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Good Question,
it needs to be Roger Federer he is by far the best,
Well you could say that For tennis it was Bjorn Borg, but Federer has or is on teh way to stealing his mantal.
NO DOUBT
2007-01-11 21:59:42 · answer #10 · answered by amac992000 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋